Victims and Aggressors

Abstract: This pilot study investigated differences in Rorschach responses between incarcerated perpetrators of violence and victims of aggression, focusing on indicators of aggressive content (AGC) and aggressive movement (AGM). The research aimed to contribute to understanding patterns of aggressive imagery in victims and perpetrators by analyzing verbalization subtleties and their associations with trauma, impulsivity, and past experiences. In the first study, four judges experienced in the Rorschach Test evaluated the protocols of victims and perpetrators of violence, identifying and justifying which responses belonged to each group. The results showed notable differences between the groups. The interrater reliability coefficient among the judges in Study 1 was 0.75, classified as excellent. In the second study, qualitative analyses were conducted. In this study, victims tended to present AGC responses marked by drama, fear, and disgust, while perpetrators often produced AGC linked to power, strength, and anger. Perpetrators also showed attempts to suppress content that clearly reflected aggressiveness. This study is relevant as it addresses a gap in the literature by comparing the content and verbalizations of victims and perpetrators using the Rorschach in the R-PAS system, offering meaningful insights into psychological functioning and supporting future research with larger, more diverse samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000203
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Victims and Aggressors

Anna Elisa de Villemor-Amaral, Juliana de Almeida Araujo
1 citations
Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach
Psychological Testing and Assessment
1.54
article

Victims and Aggressors

Anna Elisa de Villemor-Amaral, Juliana de Almeida Araujo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: This pilot study investigated differences in Rorschach responses between incarcerated perpetrators of violence and victims of aggression, focusing on indicators of aggressive content (AGC) and aggressive movement (AGM). The research aimed to contribute to understanding patterns of aggressive imagery in victims and perpetrators by analyzing verbalization subtleties and their associations with trauma, impulsivity, and past experiences. In the first study, four judges experienced in the Rorschach Test evaluated the protocols of victims and perpetrators of violence, identifying and justifying which responses belonged to each group. The results showed notable differences between the groups. The interrater reliability coefficient among the judges in Study 1 was 0.75, classified as excellent. In the second study, qualitative analyses were conducted. In this study, victims tended to present AGC responses marked by drama, fear, and disgust, while perpetrators often produced AGC linked to power, strength, and anger. Perpetrators also showed attempts to suppress content that clearly reflected aggressiveness. This study is relevant as it addresses a gap in the literature by comparing the content and verbalizations of victims and perpetrators using the Rorschach in the R-PAS system, offering meaningful insights into psychological functioning and supporting future research with larger, more diverse samples.

Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the RorschachVol. 47(1)
Universidade São Francisco (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Victims and Aggressors — Anna Elisa de Villemor-Amaral, Juliana de Almeida Araujo · Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS