Lowest common denominator messaging: issue prioritization in #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo digital coalitions

This study examines what issues are prioritized when social movements form coalitions in digital spaces, focusing on the intersection between #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo on Twitter. We collected 24,369 tweets containing both hashtags (2020–2021) and employed Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling to analyze tweet text content and network analysis to examine hashtag co-occurrence patterns. Drawing on Strolovitch’s theory of selective representation (2006, 2007)—which posits that advocacy organizations prioritize concerns of advantaged constituents over disadvantaged ones—the study classifies content as universal, majority, advantaged group, or disadvantaged group issues. We find a “lowest common denominator” effect where universal and majority issues dominate the discourse (91% of high-visibility hashtags). However, contra Strolovitch, we find that disadvantaged group issues receive greater visibility than advantaged group issues in digital coalitions. The percolation analysis of the hashtag co-occurrence network reveals a hierarchical structure with a 5.5:1 ratio between random and targeted percolation thresholds, characteristic of scale-free networks. K-core decomposition and clique analysis show that single-axis marginalization (e.g., #lgbt, #immigrants) receives greater visibility than intersectional marginalization (e.g., #blacktrans, #blackwomen), with the latter absent from high-visibility categories. These patterns suggest that digital coalitions reproduce patterns of selective representation observed in offline advocacy organizations, not through deliberate strategic choices but through decentralized user behavior shaped by network dynamics and algorithmic amplification. This research advances our understanding of how movement coalitions navigate tensions between broad appeal and addressing complex intersectional grievances while bridging social movement theory with network science principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Network Analysis and Mining
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01522-y
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lowest common denominator messaging: issue prioritization in #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo digital coalitions

Başak Taraktaş, Alp Ünal Ayhan
Social Network Analysis and Mining
Social Media and Politics
article

Lowest common denominator messaging: issue prioritization in #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo digital coalitions

Başak Taraktaş, Alp Ünal Ayhan
article en

Abstract

This study examines what issues are prioritized when social movements form coalitions in digital spaces, focusing on the intersection between #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo on Twitter. We collected 24,369 tweets containing both hashtags (2020–2021) and employed Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling to analyze tweet text content and network analysis to examine hashtag co-occurrence patterns. Drawing on Strolovitch’s theory of selective representation (2006, 2007)—which posits that advocacy organizations prioritize concerns of advantaged constituents over disadvantaged ones—the study classifies content as universal, majority, advantaged group, or disadvantaged group issues. We find a “lowest common denominator” effect where universal and majority issues dominate the discourse (91% of high-visibility hashtags). However, contra Strolovitch, we find that disadvantaged group issues receive greater visibility than advantaged group issues in digital coalitions. The percolation analysis of the hashtag co-occurrence network reveals a hierarchical structure with a 5.5:1 ratio between random and targeted percolation thresholds, characteristic of scale-free networks. K-core decomposition and clique analysis show that single-axis marginalization (e.g., #lgbt, #immigrants) receives greater visibility than intersectional marginalization (e.g., #blacktrans, #blackwomen), with the latter absent from high-visibility categories. These patterns suggest that digital coalitions reproduce patterns of selective representation observed in offline advocacy organizations, not through deliberate strategic choices but through decentralized user behavior shaped by network dynamics and algorithmic amplification. This research advances our understanding of how movement coalitions navigate tensions between broad appeal and addressing complex intersectional grievances while bridging social movement theory with network science principles.

Social Network Analysis and MiningVol. 15(1)
Koç University (TR), Boğaziçi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.