A Boundary Condition Model for Numerical Simulation for Cathodic Protection of an Underground Pipeline With Coating Defects

ABSTRACT Cathodic protection effectiveness is usually evaluated by protection potential, which can be calculated by a numerical simulation method. Its accuracy depends on the accuracy of the boundary condition description of the coated pipeline. This paper proposes an equivalent description model (equivalent method 2) for buried pipelines with coating defects. Through example comparison, the calculated results of directly constructing actual coating defects and the equivalent method based on uniform protection efficiency boundary conditions (equivalent method 1) are compared. The research results show that the widely used equivalent method 1 in the literature is only applicable to the calculation of pipe‐to‐soil potential of pipelines under constant anode output conditions. However, the equivalent method 2 proposed maintains highly consistent results with the actual coating defect model in the calculation of parameters such as pipe‐to‐soil potential, potential at ground surface, and sacrificial anode output current, with an error of less than 0.13%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials and Corrosion
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.70069
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Boundary Condition Model for Numerical Simulation for Cathodic Protection of an Underground Pipeline With Coating Defects

Yan Shen, Liang Dong, Huatian Xu, Gao Kewei et al.
Materials and Corrosion
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

A Boundary Condition Model for Numerical Simulation for Cathodic Protection of an Underground Pipeline With Coating Defects

Yan Shen, Liang Dong, Huatian Xu, Gao Kewei, Song Qinfeng, Leo J. Anthony‐Goodmans
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cathodic protection effectiveness is usually evaluated by protection potential, which can be calculated by a numerical simulation method. Its accuracy depends on the accuracy of the boundary condition description of the coated pipeline. This paper proposes an equivalent description model (equivalent method 2) for buried pipelines with coating defects. Through example comparison, the calculated results of directly constructing actual coating defects and the equivalent method based on uniform protection efficiency boundary conditions (equivalent method 1) are compared. The research results show that the widely used equivalent method 1 in the literature is only applicable to the calculation of pipe‐to‐soil potential of pipelines under constant anode output conditions. However, the equivalent method 2 proposed maintains highly consistent results with the actual coating defect model in the calculation of parameters such as pipe‐to‐soil potential, potential at ground surface, and sacrificial anode output current, with an error of less than 0.13%.

Materials and CorrosionVol. 77(3)
Line Corporation (Japan) (JP), Changzhou University (CN), Beijing Advanced Sciences and Innovation Center (CN), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.