Judgements of Propaganda Near and Far: National Identity and Media Evaluations

ABSTRACT Western media often critiques foreign governments for their propaganda efforts while ignoring similar efforts by their own government. We predicted that individuals would demonstrate a similar bias. An experiment with 282 Canadian participants revealed just the opposite: when asked overtly, participants judged a video attributed to their own government to be more like propaganda than identical foreign media. When asked covertly (e.g., about the video's bias), we observed no effect, and national identity was not a moderator for Canadians. In a direct replication, Americans ( N = 457) also judged domestic videos as more like propaganda than foreign ones, whether perceptions of propaganda were measured overtly or covertly. This difference was especially true of those lower and average in national identity, compared to those higher. A follow‐up study demonstrated that Americans ( N = 380) who are left‐leaning are more likely to show this bias against domestic media, compared to those who are centrist or right‐leaning. These studies demonstrate that people can be more critical of their own government's messaging relative to the same messaging by a foreign power, the opposite of holding a self‐serving double standard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70035
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judgements of Propaganda Near and Far: National Identity and Media Evaluations

Raymond A. Mar, Ronda F. Lo, Rebecca Joy Dunk
European Journal of Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Judgements of Propaganda Near and Far: National Identity and Media Evaluations

Raymond A. Mar, Ronda F. Lo, Rebecca Joy Dunk
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Western media often critiques foreign governments for their propaganda efforts while ignoring similar efforts by their own government. We predicted that individuals would demonstrate a similar bias. An experiment with 282 Canadian participants revealed just the opposite: when asked overtly, participants judged a video attributed to their own government to be more like propaganda than identical foreign media. When asked covertly (e.g., about the video's bias), we observed no effect, and national identity was not a moderator for Canadians. In a direct replication, Americans ( N = 457) also judged domestic videos as more like propaganda than foreign ones, whether perceptions of propaganda were measured overtly or covertly. This difference was especially true of those lower and average in national identity, compared to those higher. A follow‐up study demonstrated that Americans ( N = 380) who are left‐leaning are more likely to show this bias against domestic media, compared to those who are centrist or right‐leaning. These studies demonstrate that people can be more critical of their own government's messaging relative to the same messaging by a foreign power, the opposite of holding a self‐serving double standard.

European Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 56(1)
York University (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.