Outcome Comparison of Open Surgery and Arthroscopic Surgery in Treating Lateral Epicondylitis: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Lateral Epicondylitis (LE), or tennis elbow, is a degenerative tendinopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) causing lateral elbow pain, most common in adults aged 40–55 years. It results from repetitive wrist extension and forearm supination, leading to overuse and microtears. Diagnosis is clinical, supported by imaging when needed. Surgical treatment is reserved for refractory cases, with open and arthroscopic techniques being the main options. Arthroscopy offers faster recovery and better pain control but may require longer operative time. This meta-analysis compares outcomes of open and arthroscopic surgery for LE, focusing on pain, function, operative duration, and return-to-work time. Methods: This study following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Multiple databases were searched for studies that compared functional outcomes of open surgery versus arthroscopic surgery for lateral epicondylitis with a minimum 12 months follow-up. The outcome investigated were VAS, ROM, Grip Power (kg), Qdash Score, complication rate, and operative time. Result: Six studies were included for the quantitative meta-analysis. The analyses revealed that there were no significant difference in VAS (MD = 0.17; 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.59; p = 0.43) ROM (MD = -0.19; 95% CI, −1.56 to 1.18; p = 0.78), Grip Power (kg) (MD = 1.62; 95% CI, −1.60 to 4.83; p = 0.32), QDash score (MD = 1.27; 95% CI, −0.56 to 3.09; p = 0.17), and complication rate (MD = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.46; p = 0.15) after 12 months follow-up between arthroscopy and control group. Meanwhile, the operative time needed was significantly lower in control group compared to the arthroscopy group (MD = 17.77; 95% CI, 2.03 to 33.50; p = 0.03). Conclusion: This study concluded that there was no significant difference in term of outcome between arthroscopy and open surgery in managing lateral epicondylitis. However, open surgery took a shorter operative time compared to arthroscopy. Keywords: Open Surgery, Arthroscopic, Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Review
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20251103
Primary Topic
Tendon Structure and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcome Comparison of Open Surgery and Arthroscopic Surgery in Treating Lateral Epicondylitis: A Meta-Analysis

I Putu Surya Fajari Widhiarma, Anak Agung Gde Yuda Asmara
International Journal of Research and Review
Tendon Structure and Treatment
article

Outcome Comparison of Open Surgery and Arthroscopic Surgery in Treating Lateral Epicondylitis: A Meta-Analysis

I Putu Surya Fajari Widhiarma, Anak Agung Gde Yuda Asmara
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Lateral Epicondylitis (LE), or tennis elbow, is a degenerative tendinopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) causing lateral elbow pain, most common in adults aged 40–55 years. It results from repetitive wrist extension and forearm supination, leading to overuse and microtears. Diagnosis is clinical, supported by imaging when needed. Surgical treatment is reserved for refractory cases, with open and arthroscopic techniques being the main options. Arthroscopy offers faster recovery and better pain control but may require longer operative time. This meta-analysis compares outcomes of open and arthroscopic surgery for LE, focusing on pain, function, operative duration, and return-to-work time. Methods: This study following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Multiple databases were searched for studies that compared functional outcomes of open surgery versus arthroscopic surgery for lateral epicondylitis with a minimum 12 months follow-up. The outcome investigated were VAS, ROM, Grip Power (kg), Qdash Score, complication rate, and operative time. Result: Six studies were included for the quantitative meta-analysis. The analyses revealed that there were no significant difference in VAS (MD = 0.17; 95% CI, −0.25 to 0.59; p = 0.43) ROM (MD = -0.19; 95% CI, −1.56 to 1.18; p = 0.78), Grip Power (kg) (MD = 1.62; 95% CI, −1.60 to 4.83; p = 0.32), QDash score (MD = 1.27; 95% CI, −0.56 to 3.09; p = 0.17), and complication rate (MD = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.46; p = 0.15) after 12 months follow-up between arthroscopy and control group. Meanwhile, the operative time needed was significantly lower in control group compared to the arthroscopy group (MD = 17.77; 95% CI, 2.03 to 33.50; p = 0.03). Conclusion: This study concluded that there was no significant difference in term of outcome between arthroscopy and open surgery in managing lateral epicondylitis. However, open surgery took a shorter operative time compared to arthroscopy. Keywords: Open Surgery, Arthroscopic, Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow.

International Journal of Research and ReviewVol. 12(11)
Udayana University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Tendon Structure and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Outcome Comparison of Open Surgery and Arthroscopic Surgery in Treating Lateral Epicondylitis: A Meta-Analysis — I Putu Surya Fajari Widhiarma, Anak Agung Gde Yuda Asmara · International Journal of Research and Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS