Biochar at the Core of Nature‐Based Carbon Management: A Comparative Review Bridging Environmental Sustainability and Economic Feasibility

ABSTRACT Climate change continues to challenge both environmental stability and economic systems worldwide. Among available mitigation strategies, nature‐based carbon management (NBCM) methods provide the dual advantage of reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) and restoring ecosystems. This review examines four main NBCM approaches, forest and grassland restoration, wetland and blue‐carbon ecosystems, urban green spaces, and regenerative agriculture, to test the hypothesis that biochar‐based regenerative agriculture is the most sustainable and practical pathway for long‐term carbon sequestration. Confirming this hypothesis is essential because policy and investment decisions increasingly depend on identifying NBCM options that combine scientific effectiveness with economic feasibility. The study reviews papers, patents, and reports published between 2016 and 2024, integrating environmental, technological, and policy findings. The review reveals several key insights. Nature‐based methods collectively offer significant global potential for carbon reduction, yet their success depends on ecological and socioeconomic conditions. Biochar‐based regenerative systems stand out by showing persistent improvements in soil‐organic‐carbon storage, crop productivity, and greenhouse‐gas mitigation, supported by numerous international case studies. The analysis also identifies the main constraints, production cost, infrastructure requirements, and limited awareness, that determine the pace of large‐scale adoption. The contribution of this review lies in linking biochar's environmental durability with its socioeconomic applicability, providing a bridge between climate science, agriculture, and sustainable development policy. Future efforts should focus on field validation across climates, cost optimization for biomass‐to‐biochar chains, and supportive policy frameworks to encourage wider adoption. These findings present a clear pathway for scaling NBCM solutions, positioning biochar as a leading nature‐based strategy for long‐term climate mitigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70350
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biochar at the Core of Nature‐Based Carbon Management: A Comparative Review Bridging Environmental Sustainability and Economic Feasibility

Seyed Farhan Moosavian, Noorbakhsh Mirzaei, Reza Fattahi, Ahmad Hajinezhad et al.
2 citations
Energy Science & Engineering
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
2.37
article

Biochar at the Core of Nature‐Based Carbon Management: A Comparative Review Bridging Environmental Sustainability and Economic Feasibility

Seyed Farhan Moosavian, Noorbakhsh Mirzaei, Reza Fattahi, Ahmad Hajinezhad, Hossein Yousefi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Climate change continues to challenge both environmental stability and economic systems worldwide. Among available mitigation strategies, nature‐based carbon management (NBCM) methods provide the dual advantage of reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) and restoring ecosystems. This review examines four main NBCM approaches, forest and grassland restoration, wetland and blue‐carbon ecosystems, urban green spaces, and regenerative agriculture, to test the hypothesis that biochar‐based regenerative agriculture is the most sustainable and practical pathway for long‐term carbon sequestration. Confirming this hypothesis is essential because policy and investment decisions increasingly depend on identifying NBCM options that combine scientific effectiveness with economic feasibility. The study reviews papers, patents, and reports published between 2016 and 2024, integrating environmental, technological, and policy findings. The review reveals several key insights. Nature‐based methods collectively offer significant global potential for carbon reduction, yet their success depends on ecological and socioeconomic conditions. Biochar‐based regenerative systems stand out by showing persistent improvements in soil‐organic‐carbon storage, crop productivity, and greenhouse‐gas mitigation, supported by numerous international case studies. The analysis also identifies the main constraints, production cost, infrastructure requirements, and limited awareness, that determine the pace of large‐scale adoption. The contribution of this review lies in linking biochar's environmental durability with its socioeconomic applicability, providing a bridge between climate science, agriculture, and sustainable development policy. Future efforts should focus on field validation across climates, cost optimization for biomass‐to‐biochar chains, and supportive policy frameworks to encourage wider adoption. These findings present a clear pathway for scaling NBCM solutions, positioning biochar as a leading nature‐based strategy for long‐term climate mitigation.

Energy Science & EngineeringVol. 14(1)
University of Tehran (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.