The Dynamic and Multisource Nature of Support for Frontline-Led Innovation Teams

This 24-month inductive study examined the practices provided by a variety of supporters to six frontline-led innovation teams. Analyzing 86 interviews with 35 team members and 17 supporters, we propose a comprehensive, idealized framework of dynamic and multisource support. These practices offered critical aid as teams dealt with limited innovation experience, limited relationships, and limited contextual awareness. We categorized the practices we identified into six sets-Ensure Foundational Support, Transmit Knowledge and Skills, Nurture Teams and Teamwork, Cultivate Relationships with Decision-Makers, Scaffold Project Work, and Foster a Holistic View of Innovation Work-and discussed their benefits and boundaries of effectiveness. Our framework challenges the notion of "one-size-fits-all" support, emphasizing the value of adaptive support instead. We also highlight the critical role of coaches and identify significant roles unexpectedly played by the funder, insurer, student fellows, and research-observers that provided instruction, resources, and encouragement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Care Research and Review
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587251377322
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dynamic and Multisource Nature of Support for Frontline-Led Innovation Teams

Sara J. Singer, Olivia Jung, Patricia Satterstrom, Fletcher Dementyev et al.
Medical Care Research and Review
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

The Dynamic and Multisource Nature of Support for Frontline-Led Innovation Teams

Sara J. Singer, Olivia Jung, Patricia Satterstrom, Fletcher Dementyev, Maura Danehey
article en

Abstract

This 24-month inductive study examined the practices provided by a variety of supporters to six frontline-led innovation teams. Analyzing 86 interviews with 35 team members and 17 supporters, we propose a comprehensive, idealized framework of dynamic and multisource support. These practices offered critical aid as teams dealt with limited innovation experience, limited relationships, and limited contextual awareness. We categorized the practices we identified into six sets-Ensure Foundational Support, Transmit Knowledge and Skills, Nurture Teams and Teamwork, Cultivate Relationships with Decision-Makers, Scaffold Project Work, and Foster a Holistic View of Innovation Work-and discussed their benefits and boundaries of effectiveness. Our framework challenges the notion of "one-size-fits-all" support, emphasizing the value of adaptive support instead. We also highlight the critical role of coaches and identify significant roles unexpectedly played by the funder, insurer, student fellows, and research-observers that provided instruction, resources, and encouragement.

Medical Care Research and ReviewVol. 83(2)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), City University of Seattle (US), New York University (US), Columbia University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.