Prioritising Value Categories in Turkish Secondary School Curricula: A Social Class Perspective

ABSTRACT This study explores how parents from nine occupationally defined social classes in Turkey prioritise value categories in the secondary school curriculum, examining links between socioeconomic status and value‐based education. Using a cross‐sectional survey, data were collected from 311 parents in 10 randomly selected schools. After a brief orientation session, participants rated each value category as ‘less important’, ‘important’, or ‘very important’. Findings show religious‐moral, national, and democratic values were consistently prioritised across all groups, while aesthetic values received the lowest priority. Nevertheless, over 60% of participants (excluding freelancers) rated aesthetic values as ‘important’ or ‘very important’. Freelancers, who often face economic instability, assigned lower importance to aesthetic, scientific, and individualistic values, possibly due to their economic constraints. The results reveal shared cultural foundations alongside subtle occupational differences in parental value orientations. Theoretically, they contribute to intergenerational value transmission debates; practically, they support integrating socioeconomic diversity into curriculum design and educational policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70344
Primary Topic
Values and Moral Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritising Value Categories in Turkish Secondary School Curricula: A Social Class Perspective

Mehmet Kart
European Journal of Education
Values and Moral Education
article

Prioritising Value Categories in Turkish Secondary School Curricula: A Social Class Perspective

Mehmet Kart
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores how parents from nine occupationally defined social classes in Turkey prioritise value categories in the secondary school curriculum, examining links between socioeconomic status and value‐based education. Using a cross‐sectional survey, data were collected from 311 parents in 10 randomly selected schools. After a brief orientation session, participants rated each value category as ‘less important’, ‘important’, or ‘very important’. Findings show religious‐moral, national, and democratic values were consistently prioritised across all groups, while aesthetic values received the lowest priority. Nevertheless, over 60% of participants (excluding freelancers) rated aesthetic values as ‘important’ or ‘very important’. Freelancers, who often face economic instability, assigned lower importance to aesthetic, scientific, and individualistic values, possibly due to their economic constraints. The results reveal shared cultural foundations alongside subtle occupational differences in parental value orientations. Theoretically, they contribute to intergenerational value transmission debates; practically, they support integrating socioeconomic diversity into curriculum design and educational policymaking.

European Journal of EducationVol. 60(4)
Ahi Evran University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Values and Moral Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.