Are People Willing to Trade Away Democracy for Desirable Outcomes? Experimental Evidence From Six Countries

To what extent do people prioritize living in a democracy over other indicators of good governance or personal well-being? This question has become contested as democracies come under pressure worldwide. We provide an answer through cross-national conjoint experiments in which survey respondents choose between hypothetical countries that differ in terms of societal-level attributes (e.g., elections, health care) and individual-level outcomes that the respondent would experience (e.g., wealth, minority status). People across Egypt, India, Italy, Japan, Thailand, and the United States consistently prioritize living in a safe country with free and fair elections over other factors, including other components of democracy like civil liberties and checks and balances. Regarding tradeoffs, many people would forfeit democratic elections to avoid living in a dangerous society but not to obtain wealth and other goods. Electoral democracy is attractive globally but can be undermined by concerns about crime and safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251392539
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are People Willing to Trade Away Democracy for Desirable Outcomes? Experimental Evidence From Six Countries

Scott Williamson, Jonathan Chu, Eddy S. F. Yeung
2 citations
Comparative Political Studies
Political Conflict and Governance
8.40
article

Are People Willing to Trade Away Democracy for Desirable Outcomes? Experimental Evidence From Six Countries

Scott Williamson, Jonathan Chu, Eddy S. F. Yeung
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To what extent do people prioritize living in a democracy over other indicators of good governance or personal well-being? This question has become contested as democracies come under pressure worldwide. We provide an answer through cross-national conjoint experiments in which survey respondents choose between hypothetical countries that differ in terms of societal-level attributes (e.g., elections, health care) and individual-level outcomes that the respondent would experience (e.g., wealth, minority status). People across Egypt, India, Italy, Japan, Thailand, and the United States consistently prioritize living in a safe country with free and fair elections over other factors, including other components of democracy like civil liberties and checks and balances. Regarding tradeoffs, many people would forfeit democratic elections to avoid living in a dangerous society but not to obtain wealth and other goods. Electoral democracy is attractive globally but can be undermined by concerns about crime and safety.

Comparative Political Studies
National University of Singapore (SG), University of Oxford (GB), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Conflict and Governance
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are People Willing to Trade Away Democracy for Desirable Outcomes? Experimental Evidence From Six Countries — Scott Williamson, Jonathan Chu, et al. · Comparative Political Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS