Obfuscated Consensus

The classic Fischer, Lynch, and Paterson impossibility proof [7, 12] demonstrates that any deterministic protocol for consensus in either a message-passing or shared-memory system must violate at least one of termination, validity, or agreement in some execution. But it does not provide an efficient procedure to find such a bad execution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3820355.3820383
Primary Topic
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obfuscated Consensus

James Aspnes, Shlomi Dolev, Amit Hendin
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
article

Obfuscated Consensus

James Aspnes, Shlomi Dolev, Amit Hendin
article en

Abstract

The classic Fischer, Lynch, and Paterson impossibility proof [7, 12] demonstrates that any deterministic protocol for consensus in either a message-passing or shared-memory system must violate at least one of termination, validity, or agreement in some execution. But it does not provide an efficient procedure to find such a bad execution.

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Obfuscated Consensus — James Aspnes, Shlomi Dolev, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS