Bridging Divides or Widening Gaps? Nonprofit Organizations’ Efforts for Migrant Inclusion in Two Global Cities

Nonprofit organizations are often seen as critical nodes in shaping migrant experiences and supporting the inclusion and representation within host communities. In doing so, nonprofits encounter numerous obstacles. With this study, we explore the factors influencing how well nonprofits include, reach out to, and serve migrants relative to their local presence. We analyze organizational survey data from two distinct urban contexts: Vienna (Austria) and Shenzhen (China), each with unique institutional, political, and cultural backgrounds. Our findings suggest that interpersonal contact and representative governance in nonprofit organizations are closely linked to their (un)responsiveness to the needs of migrant populations. These results challenge the often-idealized perceptions of urban civic spaces and community interactions, underscoring the paradoxical mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640251387954
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging Divides or Widening Gaps? Nonprofit Organizations’ Efforts for Migrant Inclusion in Two Global Cities

Berta Terzieva, Long Yan, Luo Wei
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Bridging Divides or Widening Gaps? Nonprofit Organizations’ Efforts for Migrant Inclusion in Two Global Cities

Berta Terzieva, Long Yan, Luo Wei
article en

Abstract

Nonprofit organizations are often seen as critical nodes in shaping migrant experiences and supporting the inclusion and representation within host communities. In doing so, nonprofits encounter numerous obstacles. With this study, we explore the factors influencing how well nonprofits include, reach out to, and serve migrants relative to their local presence. We analyze organizational survey data from two distinct urban contexts: Vienna (Austria) and Shenzhen (China), each with unique institutional, political, and cultural backgrounds. Our findings suggest that interpersonal contact and representative governance in nonprofit organizations are closely linked to their (un)responsiveness to the needs of migrant populations. These results challenge the often-idealized perceptions of urban civic spaces and community interactions, underscoring the paradoxical mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), Peking University (CN), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging Divides or Widening Gaps? Nonprofit Organizations’ Efforts for Migrant Inclusion in Two Global Cities — Berta Terzieva, Long Yan, et al. · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS