Back to the Future: Labour and the Politics of Financial Deregulation

Abstract One of the professed aims of the current Labour government in the UK is to boost GDP by ‘cutting red tape’. This also applies to the financial sector, where in recent months regulators have been asked to reflect on how rule changes could contribute to competitiveness and growth. A flurry of deregulatory initiatives has resulted from this. In this article, I will argue that far from unproblematically boosting GDP, many of these initiatives actually pose a threat to long‐term economic well‐being. This is particularly true of those regulations that have a ‘macroprudential’ orientation, since these have already been calibrated with the goal of optimising economic welfare across different time horizons. Rolling back these regulations constitutes a bet on potential small short‐term increases in GDP at the cost of reduced long‐term stability that could cause much higher losses down the line.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Political Quarterly
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.70026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic, financial, and policy analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Back to the Future: Labour and the Politics of Financial Deregulation

Nick Kotucha
1 citations
The Political Quarterly
Economic, financial, and policy analysis
3.09
article

Back to the Future: Labour and the Politics of Financial Deregulation

Nick Kotucha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract One of the professed aims of the current Labour government in the UK is to boost GDP by ‘cutting red tape’. This also applies to the financial sector, where in recent months regulators have been asked to reflect on how rule changes could contribute to competitiveness and growth. A flurry of deregulatory initiatives has resulted from this. In this article, I will argue that far from unproblematically boosting GDP, many of these initiatives actually pose a threat to long‐term economic well‐being. This is particularly true of those regulations that have a ‘macroprudential’ orientation, since these have already been calibrated with the goal of optimising economic welfare across different time horizons. Rolling back these regulations constitutes a bet on potential small short‐term increases in GDP at the cost of reduced long‐term stability that could cause much higher losses down the line.

The Political Quarterly
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Economic, financial, and policy analysis
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.