The Effect of Small Asymmetric Shoulder Loads on Postural Control in Older People

Background: Asymmetrical load carrying can impair balance and increase fall risk, especially in older adults. This study compared postural control in 33 older (mean age 72.2 ± 11.0 years) and 27 younger (mean age 33.5 ± 15.8 years) adults. Methods: Participants performed three 20 s quiet standing trials on a force plate: no load, 3 kg left shoulder load, and 3 kg right shoulder load. Center-of-pressure (COP) variability, range, mean velocity, and sample entropy were computed. This was a quasi-experimental study with a mixed-design ANOVA (Group as between-subjects factor; Load and Plane as within-subjects factors). Results: Younger adults showed better overall stability than older adults across conditions. Older adults had larger COP range than younger adults with no load and with the right-sided load. Notably, no significant difference in COP range was found between groups with the left-sided load. Key statistical findings included the significant Load × Group interaction (F(2, 116) = 3.9, p = 0.024, ηp2 = 0.06) for COP range. Conclusions: A small asymmetrical load on the left side may be associated with postural control in older adults, possibly through familiar sensory cues. Conversely, a right-sided load appears to negatively impact their balance. These findings highlight the differential effects of load side on postural control in older individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211983
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Small Asymmetric Shoulder Loads on Postural Control in Older People

Dorota Borzucka, Michał Kuczyński, Krzysztof Kręcisz
Applied Sciences
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

The Effect of Small Asymmetric Shoulder Loads on Postural Control in Older People

Dorota Borzucka, Michał Kuczyński, Krzysztof Kręcisz
article en

Abstract

Background: Asymmetrical load carrying can impair balance and increase fall risk, especially in older adults. This study compared postural control in 33 older (mean age 72.2 ± 11.0 years) and 27 younger (mean age 33.5 ± 15.8 years) adults. Methods: Participants performed three 20 s quiet standing trials on a force plate: no load, 3 kg left shoulder load, and 3 kg right shoulder load. Center-of-pressure (COP) variability, range, mean velocity, and sample entropy were computed. This was a quasi-experimental study with a mixed-design ANOVA (Group as between-subjects factor; Load and Plane as within-subjects factors). Results: Younger adults showed better overall stability than older adults across conditions. Older adults had larger COP range than younger adults with no load and with the right-sided load. Notably, no significant difference in COP range was found between groups with the left-sided load. Key statistical findings included the significant Load × Group interaction (F(2, 116) = 3.9, p = 0.024, ηp2 = 0.06) for COP range. Conclusions: A small asymmetrical load on the left side may be associated with postural control in older adults, possibly through familiar sensory cues. Conversely, a right-sided load appears to negatively impact their balance. These findings highlight the differential effects of load side on postural control in older individuals.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(22)
Opole University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.