Performance Evaluation Metrics for Empathetic LLMs

With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), recent systems have demonstrated increasing capability in understanding and expressing human emotions. However, no objective and standardized metric currently exists to evaluate how empathetic an LLM’s response is. To address this gap, we propose a novel evaluation framework that measures both sentiment-level and emotion-level alignment between a user query and a model-generated response. The proposed metric consists of two components. The sentiment component evaluates overall affective polarity through Sentlink and the naturalness of emotional expression via NEmpathySort. The emotion component measures fine-grained emotional correspondence using Emosight. Additionally, a semantic component, based on RAGAS, assesses the contextual relevance and coherence of the response. Experimental results demonstrate that our metric effectively captures both the intensity and nuance of empathy in LLM-generated responses, providing a solid foundation for the development of emotionally intelligent conversational AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info16110977
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation Metrics for Empathetic LLMs

Hanseok Ko, You Jung Hong, Bonhwa Ku
1 citations
Information
Topic Modeling
2.48
article

Performance Evaluation Metrics for Empathetic LLMs

Hanseok Ko, You Jung Hong, Bonhwa Ku
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), recent systems have demonstrated increasing capability in understanding and expressing human emotions. However, no objective and standardized metric currently exists to evaluate how empathetic an LLM’s response is. To address this gap, we propose a novel evaluation framework that measures both sentiment-level and emotion-level alignment between a user query and a model-generated response. The proposed metric consists of two components. The sentiment component evaluates overall affective polarity through Sentlink and the naturalness of emotional expression via NEmpathySort. The emotion component measures fine-grained emotional correspondence using Emosight. Additionally, a semantic component, based on RAGAS, assesses the contextual relevance and coherence of the response. Experimental results demonstrate that our metric effectively captures both the intensity and nuance of empathy in LLM-generated responses, providing a solid foundation for the development of emotionally intelligent conversational AI.

InformationVol. 16(11)
University of America (US), Korea University (KR), Catholic University of America (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Topic Modeling
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.