Boards and ESG Performance: The Contingent Influence of Climate Vulnerability on Global Banks

ABSTRACT This study examines the contingent effect of climate vulnerability on the relationship between board characteristics and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of global banks. We use a dataset of 438 banks across 54 countries (2010–2022) and fixed effects estimation, two‐stage least squares, and generalized method of moments to address potential endogeneity. Our findings show that the effectiveness of board governance mechanisms on ESG performance depends on the levels of climate vulnerability. Although most mechanisms perform well in low‐risk contexts, only CSR committees and gender diversity on the board improve ESG performance in stable and highly vulnerable environments. These results highlight the importance of integrating climate vulnerability into corporate governance frameworks, suggesting that a one‐size‐fits‐all approach to board composition is insufficient. This study underscores the need for adaptive governance strategies that align with regional climate risks and offers practical insights for regulators, investors, and executives to enhance ESG performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70314
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boards and ESG Performance: The Contingent Influence of Climate Vulnerability on Global Banks

Pilar Giráldez, Reyes Samaniego‐Medina, Renata Karkowska, Zbigniew Korzeb
1 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Boards and ESG Performance: The Contingent Influence of Climate Vulnerability on Global Banks

Pilar Giráldez, Reyes Samaniego‐Medina, Renata Karkowska, Zbigniew Korzeb
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the contingent effect of climate vulnerability on the relationship between board characteristics and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of global banks. We use a dataset of 438 banks across 54 countries (2010–2022) and fixed effects estimation, two‐stage least squares, and generalized method of moments to address potential endogeneity. Our findings show that the effectiveness of board governance mechanisms on ESG performance depends on the levels of climate vulnerability. Although most mechanisms perform well in low‐risk contexts, only CSR committees and gender diversity on the board improve ESG performance in stable and highly vulnerable environments. These results highlight the importance of integrating climate vulnerability into corporate governance frameworks, suggesting that a one‐size‐fits‐all approach to board composition is insufficient. This study underscores the need for adaptive governance strategies that align with regional climate risks and offers practical insights for regulators, investors, and executives to enhance ESG performance.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 35(2)
VIZJA University (PL), University of Warsaw (PL), Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Junta de Andalucía, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Boards and ESG Performance: The Contingent Influence of Climate Vulnerability on Global Banks — Pilar Giráldez, Reyes Samaniego‐Medina, et al. · Business Strategy and the Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS