How Scientists’ Narratives on AI Signal a New Era for Science Education

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a central topic in scientific and public discourse, raising important questions about its impact on science, society, and education. The paper reports an empirical study on 151 scientist commentaries published from 2021 to 2024 in the top scientific outlets of Nature and Science to examine evolving trends in AI-related communication in science. Using epistemic network analysis, we explored how scientists’ narratives frame the nature of science (NOS), a central area of science education research since at least the 1960s. The current impact of AI on science needs to be understood in order to ensure that contemporary depictions of NOS in science education are consistent with the fast-changing landscape of scientific research. Findings show that expert commentaries address multiple dimensions of NOS, with scientific practices as the central concept. Surrounding these practices, scientific and social values emerge as key considerations for utilising AI as a tool for scientific research and social contributions. While epistemic aspects of NOS remain a focus, the findings suggest that the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022 shifted attention toward social-institutional dimensions, emphasising more the social and political structures that underpin NOS. These trends highlight the evolving relationship between epistemic and societal aspects of AI, reflecting broader debates on ethics, governance, and applications. Expert commentaries serve as valuable resources for aligning science education with contemporary accounts of scientific research, and as such they signal a new era for science education in the age of AI where the social and institutional aspects of science play a major role. The implications for science education are discussed highlighting how socially embedded NOS can potentially prepare future scientists and citizens to critically engage with AI and other emerging technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Science Education
Published
2025-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10307-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Scientists’ Narratives on AI Signal a New Era for Science Education

Sibel Erduran, Ho‐Yin Chan
3 citations
Research in Science Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
article

How Scientists’ Narratives on AI Signal a New Era for Science Education

Sibel Erduran, Ho‐Yin Chan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a central topic in scientific and public discourse, raising important questions about its impact on science, society, and education. The paper reports an empirical study on 151 scientist commentaries published from 2021 to 2024 in the top scientific outlets of Nature and Science to examine evolving trends in AI-related communication in science. Using epistemic network analysis, we explored how scientists’ narratives frame the nature of science (NOS), a central area of science education research since at least the 1960s. The current impact of AI on science needs to be understood in order to ensure that contemporary depictions of NOS in science education are consistent with the fast-changing landscape of scientific research. Findings show that expert commentaries address multiple dimensions of NOS, with scientific practices as the central concept. Surrounding these practices, scientific and social values emerge as key considerations for utilising AI as a tool for scientific research and social contributions. While epistemic aspects of NOS remain a focus, the findings suggest that the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022 shifted attention toward social-institutional dimensions, emphasising more the social and political structures that underpin NOS. These trends highlight the evolving relationship between epistemic and societal aspects of AI, reflecting broader debates on ethics, governance, and applications. Expert commentaries serve as valuable resources for aligning science education with contemporary accounts of scientific research, and as such they signal a new era for science education in the age of AI where the social and institutional aspects of science play a major role. The implications for science education are discussed highlighting how socially embedded NOS can potentially prepare future scientists and citizens to critically engage with AI and other emerging technologies.

Research in Science Education
University of Oxford (GB)
University of Oxford, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.