Constructing and contesting industry’s role in multistakeholder governance: a qualitative analysis of responses to WHO consultations

Our findings underscore the contested nature of MSG, with actors calling on similar values and terminology to support fundamentally opposing positions. The ambiguity of concepts like participation, accountability and conflicts of interest may risk creating an opportunity for private sector interests to promote MSG as an ambiguous governance concept to fit their agenda. Given the normative role of WHO and other UN agencies in shaping what is considered 'good governance', it is essential for the WHO and other UN agencies to critically examine the evidence on multistakeholder approaches before deciding on its appropriateness and use unambiguous terminology when discussing their interpretation of the approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalization and Health
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01159-8
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing and contesting industry’s role in multistakeholder governance: a qualitative analysis of responses to WHO consultations

Britta Matthes, Amber Van Den Akker, Kathrin Lauber, Anna Gilmore et al.
Globalization and Health
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Constructing and contesting industry’s role in multistakeholder governance: a qualitative analysis of responses to WHO consultations

Britta Matthes, Amber Van Den Akker, Kathrin Lauber, Anna Gilmore, Xinmei Sun
article en

Abstract

Our findings underscore the contested nature of MSG, with actors calling on similar values and terminology to support fundamentally opposing positions. The ambiguity of concepts like participation, accountability and conflicts of interest may risk creating an opportunity for private sector interests to promote MSG as an ambiguous governance concept to fit their agenda. Given the normative role of WHO and other UN agencies in shaping what is considered 'good governance', it is essential for the WHO and other UN agencies to critically examine the evidence on multistakeholder approaches before deciding on its appropriateness and use unambiguous terminology when discussing their interpretation of the approach.

Globalization and HealthVol. 21(1)
University of Bath (GB), Lancaster University (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
University of Bath
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.