Community Experiences and Perceptions of the Broad One Health Endectocide-Based Malaria Intervention in Africa Trial of Ivermectin Mass Drug Administration: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study in Kwale County, Kenya

Mass drug administration (MDA) of ivermectin is currently being evaluated for malaria control. Uptake and adherence to MDA are shaped by various individual, social, and operational factors; however, the authors of most studies have focused on individual drivers of uptake. In the present paper, a longitudinal qualitative study undertaken alongside the Broad One Health Endectocide-Based Malaria Intervention in Africa (BOHEMIA) ivermectin MDA clinical trial is reported to examine community experiences and perceptions of the trial and the ivermectin MDA. Using purposive maximum variation sampling, researchers selected five villages involved in the BOHEMIA trial (two in the intervention arm and three in the control arm). Before the trial, researchers lived in each village for 1 month, making observations and conducting in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). They returned before the first MDA round and remained throughout all three rounds, gathering insights on trial implementation, community perceptions, and perceived effects of the MDA. During this period, a total of 22 IDIs were conducted, along with structured observation reports. Two months after the MDA, 15 FGDs were held in eight additional villages. The findings indicate that during the trial, addressing needs and confidence in the implementing institution fostered participation, whereas previous negative experiences with MDA interventions and perceived exclusion from community engagement activities reduced involvement. The MDA was widely perceived as effective in reducing mosquitoes and malaria in both arms of the trial. It was also seen as highly effective against bedbugs in the intervention arm. These insights highlight the importance of trust, engagement, and previous experiences in shaping community participation in MDA programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.25-0145
Primary Topic
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community Experiences and Perceptions of the Broad One Health Endectocide-Based Malaria Intervention in Africa Trial of Ivermectin Mass Drug Administration: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study in Kwale County, Kenya

Carlos Chaccour, Winnie Wangari, Truphena Onyango, Caroline Jones et al.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
article

Community Experiences and Perceptions of the Broad One Health Endectocide-Based Malaria Intervention in Africa Trial of Ivermectin Mass Drug Administration: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study in Kwale County, Kenya

Carlos Chaccour, Winnie Wangari, Truphena Onyango, Caroline Jones, Joseph Mwangangi, N. Regina Rabinovich, Marta F. Maia, Khadija Nuru, Karisa Kazungu, Lydia Kasiwa
article en

Abstract

Mass drug administration (MDA) of ivermectin is currently being evaluated for malaria control. Uptake and adherence to MDA are shaped by various individual, social, and operational factors; however, the authors of most studies have focused on individual drivers of uptake. In the present paper, a longitudinal qualitative study undertaken alongside the Broad One Health Endectocide-Based Malaria Intervention in Africa (BOHEMIA) ivermectin MDA clinical trial is reported to examine community experiences and perceptions of the trial and the ivermectin MDA. Using purposive maximum variation sampling, researchers selected five villages involved in the BOHEMIA trial (two in the intervention arm and three in the control arm). Before the trial, researchers lived in each village for 1 month, making observations and conducting in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). They returned before the first MDA round and remained throughout all three rounds, gathering insights on trial implementation, community perceptions, and perceived effects of the MDA. During this period, a total of 22 IDIs were conducted, along with structured observation reports. Two months after the MDA, 15 FGDs were held in eight additional villages. The findings indicate that during the trial, addressing needs and confidence in the implementing institution fostered participation, whereas previous negative experiences with MDA interventions and perceived exclusion from community engagement activities reduced involvement. The MDA was widely perceived as effective in reducing mosquitoes and malaria in both arms of the trial. It was also seen as highly effective against bedbugs in the intervention arm. These insights highlight the importance of trust, engagement, and previous experiences in shaping community participation in MDA programs.

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygieneVol. 114(1)
Harvard University (US), Angkor Hospital for Children (KH), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.