A comparison of clinical prediction scores for massive traumatic hemorrhage
The ABC, TASH, and SI scores performed poorly to moderately across key bleeding outcomes. These findings highlight the need for improved tools aligned with real-time, clinically actionable endpoints in trauma resuscitation.
Authors
- Doran Drew (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5715-3791)
- Leah Rosenkrantz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0832-3480)
- Chelsea Lanos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4909-1305)
- Tyler Lamb (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8449-5933)
- Brodie Nolan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-0643)
- Naisan Garraway
- Manya Charette (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-0155)
- Kevin Durr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-0437)
- Eusang Ahn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7725-7491)
- Christian Vaillancourt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8563-4656)
- Alexandre Tran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9424-2390)
- Peter Glen
- Jacinthe Lampron
- Maher Matar
Institutions
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Li Ka Shing Foundation (CN)
- Ottawa Hospital (CA)
- Ottawa University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
- Published
- 2025-11-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01499-9
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.55