The parity paradox: does number of children (parity) influence breast cancer mortality across the life course?

While parity (number of births) has been extensively studied in relation to breast cancer risk, its age-specific impact on breast cancer mortality remains unclear. We examined how the relationship between parity and breast cancer mortality rates varies across age groups. This retrospective cohort study was based on 894,608 Israeli women born between 1940 and 1960 and followed for 31 years (1990-2020). Employing an age-stratified approach (30-49, 50-64, and 65-80 years), we used Cox regression to examine the associations between number of children (0, 1-2, and ≥ 3) and breast cancer mortality rates, adjusting for sociodemographic variables and calendar year of entry into each age group. Amongst the 30-49 bracket, those with 1-2 children (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.656; 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.349-2.033) or ≥ 3 children (HR = 1.551; 99% CI 1.271-1.893) had a greater breast cancer mortality risk than childless women. In the 50-64 bracket, these differences disappeared after adjustment (HR = 1.071; 99% CI 0.949-1.209 and HR = 0.935; 99% CI 0.830-1.054, respectively). In the 65-80 bracket, those with 1-2 children continued to exhibit an elevated risk (HR = 1.237; 99% CI 1.045-1.466), no significant difference existing between women with ≥ 3 children and childless women (HR = 0.989; 99% CI 0.834-1.173). An age-dependent relationship thus obtained between parity and breast cancer mortality. These findings highlight the need for age-tailored approaches to breast cancer risk assessment and prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14993-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The parity paradox: does number of children (parity) influence breast cancer mortality across the life course?

Dan Bouhnik, Ronit Pinchas Mizrachi
1 citations
BMC Cancer
Cancer Risks and Factors
1.05
article

The parity paradox: does number of children (parity) influence breast cancer mortality across the life course?

Dan Bouhnik, Ronit Pinchas Mizrachi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While parity (number of births) has been extensively studied in relation to breast cancer risk, its age-specific impact on breast cancer mortality remains unclear. We examined how the relationship between parity and breast cancer mortality rates varies across age groups. This retrospective cohort study was based on 894,608 Israeli women born between 1940 and 1960 and followed for 31 years (1990-2020). Employing an age-stratified approach (30-49, 50-64, and 65-80 years), we used Cox regression to examine the associations between number of children (0, 1-2, and ≥ 3) and breast cancer mortality rates, adjusting for sociodemographic variables and calendar year of entry into each age group. Amongst the 30-49 bracket, those with 1-2 children (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.656; 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.349-2.033) or ≥ 3 children (HR = 1.551; 99% CI 1.271-1.893) had a greater breast cancer mortality risk than childless women. In the 50-64 bracket, these differences disappeared after adjustment (HR = 1.071; 99% CI 0.949-1.209 and HR = 0.935; 99% CI 0.830-1.054, respectively). In the 65-80 bracket, those with 1-2 children continued to exhibit an elevated risk (HR = 1.237; 99% CI 1.045-1.466), no significant difference existing between women with ≥ 3 children and childless women (HR = 0.989; 99% CI 0.834-1.173). An age-dependent relationship thus obtained between parity and breast cancer mortality. These findings highlight the need for age-tailored approaches to breast cancer risk assessment and prevention.

BMC CancerVol. 25(1)
Jerusalem College of Technology (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cancer Risks and Factors
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.