Integrating historical archives and geospatial data to revise flood estimation equations for Philippine rivers

Abstract. Flood magnitude and frequency estimation are essential for the design of structural and nature-based flood risk management interventions and water resources planning. However, the global geography of hydrological observations is uneven, with many regions, especially in the Global South, having spatially and temporally sparse data that limit the choice of statistical methods for flood estimation. To address this data scarcity, we pool all available annual maximum flood data for the Philippines to estimate flood magnitudes at the national scale. Available river discharge data were collected from publications covering 842 sites, with data spanning from 1908 to 2018. Of these, 466 sites met criteria for reliable estimation of the annual maximum flood. Using the index flood approach, a range of controls was assessed at both national and regional scales using modern land cover and rainfall data sets, as well as geospatial catchment characteristics. Predictive equations for 2 to 100 year recurrence interval floods using only catchment area as a predictor have R2≤0.59. Adding a rainfall variable, the median annual maximum 1 d rainfall, increases R2 to between 0.56 for Q100 and 0.66 for Q2. Very few other topographic or land use variables were significant when added to multiple regression equations. Relatively low R2 values in flood predictions are typical of studies from tropical regions. Although the Philippines exhibits regional climate variability, residuals from national predictive equations show limited spatial structure, and region-specific equations do not significantly outperform the national equations. The predictive equations are suitable for use as design equations in ungauged catchments for the Philippines, but statistical uncertainties must be reported. Our approach demonstrates how combining individually short historical records, after careful screening and exclusion of unreliable data, can generate large data sets that can produce consistent results. Extension of continuous flood records by continuous and rated monitoring is required to reduce uncertainties. However, the national-scale consistency in our results suggests that extrapolation from a small number of carefully selected catchments could provide nationally reliable predictive equations with reduced uncertainties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6181-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating historical archives and geospatial data to revise flood estimation equations for Philippine rivers

Richard Williams, Carlos Primo C. David, Trevor Hoey, Esmael Guardian et al.
1 citations
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

Integrating historical archives and geospatial data to revise flood estimation equations for Philippine rivers

Richard Williams, Carlos Primo C. David, Trevor Hoey, Esmael Guardian, Richard Boothroyd, Pamela Louise M. Tolentino, Enrico C. Paringit, John Perez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Flood magnitude and frequency estimation are essential for the design of structural and nature-based flood risk management interventions and water resources planning. However, the global geography of hydrological observations is uneven, with many regions, especially in the Global South, having spatially and temporally sparse data that limit the choice of statistical methods for flood estimation. To address this data scarcity, we pool all available annual maximum flood data for the Philippines to estimate flood magnitudes at the national scale. Available river discharge data were collected from publications covering 842 sites, with data spanning from 1908 to 2018. Of these, 466 sites met criteria for reliable estimation of the annual maximum flood. Using the index flood approach, a range of controls was assessed at both national and regional scales using modern land cover and rainfall data sets, as well as geospatial catchment characteristics. Predictive equations for 2 to 100 year recurrence interval floods using only catchment area as a predictor have R2≤0.59. Adding a rainfall variable, the median annual maximum 1 d rainfall, increases R2 to between 0.56 for Q100 and 0.66 for Q2. Very few other topographic or land use variables were significant when added to multiple regression equations. Relatively low R2 values in flood predictions are typical of studies from tropical regions. Although the Philippines exhibits regional climate variability, residuals from national predictive equations show limited spatial structure, and region-specific equations do not significantly outperform the national equations. The predictive equations are suitable for use as design equations in ungauged catchments for the Philippines, but statistical uncertainties must be reported. Our approach demonstrates how combining individually short historical records, after careful screening and exclusion of unreliable data, can generate large data sets that can produce consistent results. Extension of continuous flood records by continuous and rated monitoring is required to reduce uncertainties. However, the national-scale consistency in our results suggests that extrapolation from a small number of carefully selected catchments could provide nationally reliable predictive equations with reduced uncertainties.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 29(21)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Liverpool (GB), Government of New Zealand (NZ), Department of Science and Technology (PH), Brunel University of London (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), University of the Philippines Diliman (PH)
Scottish Funding Council, Natural Environment Research Council, Philippine Council for Industry, Energy, and Emerging Technology Research and Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.