Hard to Read, Harder to Access: US Disability Policy of State Correctional Departments

Abstract In the United States, people who are incarcerated average a fifth grade reading level, and approximately one in four persons incarcerated have a cognitive disability. Given the necessity of health and safety within correctional institutions and federal rights around accessibility, practical information held in policies, particularly policies about people with disabilities, should be written at a level that is comprehensible to those incarcerated. The current study evaluates the readability of publicly available general disability, as well as intellectual or developmental disability (IDD), titled correctional policies using three standard readability metrics (Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch‐Kincaid Grade Level, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook). Overall, 33 states (66%) had either publicly available general disability or IDD titled correctional policies. Only three states had both general and IDD‐specific policies. Nearly one‐third of states lacked publicly available disability policies; those available far exceeded recommended fifth to sixth grade reading levels. On average, 1‐year post‐bachelor's degree education is needed to comprehend general disability policies (41 policies, 32 states), and a bachelor's degree is needed to comprehend IDD‐specific policies (5 policies, 4 states). Disability policies that are difficult to comprehend may increase harm for incarcerated individuals with disabilities, underscoring the need for state correctional policies to be written at accessible reading levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Criminology
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.70015
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hard to Read, Harder to Access: US Disability Policy of State Correctional Departments

Brittany E. Hayes, Alicen Potts, Samantha Boch, Myrinda Schweitzer Smith et al.
Criminology
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

Hard to Read, Harder to Access: US Disability Policy of State Correctional Departments

Brittany E. Hayes, Alicen Potts, Samantha Boch, Myrinda Schweitzer Smith, Natalie Artman
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the United States, people who are incarcerated average a fifth grade reading level, and approximately one in four persons incarcerated have a cognitive disability. Given the necessity of health and safety within correctional institutions and federal rights around accessibility, practical information held in policies, particularly policies about people with disabilities, should be written at a level that is comprehensible to those incarcerated. The current study evaluates the readability of publicly available general disability, as well as intellectual or developmental disability (IDD), titled correctional policies using three standard readability metrics (Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch‐Kincaid Grade Level, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook). Overall, 33 states (66%) had either publicly available general disability or IDD titled correctional policies. Only three states had both general and IDD‐specific policies. Nearly one‐third of states lacked publicly available disability policies; those available far exceeded recommended fifth to sixth grade reading levels. On average, 1‐year post‐bachelor's degree education is needed to comprehend general disability policies (41 policies, 32 states), and a bachelor's degree is needed to comprehend IDD‐specific policies (5 policies, 4 states). Disability policies that are difficult to comprehend may increase harm for incarcerated individuals with disabilities, underscoring the need for state correctional policies to be written at accessible reading levels.

CriminologyVol. 64(1)
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hard to Read, Harder to Access: US Disability Policy of State Correctional Departments — Brittany E. Hayes, Alicen Potts, et al. · Criminology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS