A Model-Based Analysis of the AggregateEU Mechanism: Implications of Overbidding and Non-Commitment

AggregateEU is a new centralised mechanism that provides a no-commitment platform to trade natural gas in the European Union. Throughout the consultation process, AggregateEU has been mocked as ‘Tinder of the European gas markets’ as it helps consumers and suppliers find partners, but leaves it up to the matched partners to decide whether to contract for potential trade. The non-commitment nature leads to substantial overbidding and many non-realised matches. We propose a quantitative modelling framework to study the effect of overbidding in the AggergateEU demand aggregation or joint purchasing mechanism. We conclude that the mechanism is prone to overbidding and that overbidding has ambiguous effects on trade. Depending on the parameters, overbidding may facilitate trade, but may also result in highly inefficient outcomes when overbidding is combined with miscoordination over the delivery points. Suggested remedies include allowing for convex bids, restrictions on overbidding or giving up part of the non-binding character of the market. Our results suggest that a potential future mechanism allowing the coordination of multiple delivery points could enhance the efficiency of gas markets. JEL Classification : C72, Noncooperative Games; C63, Computational Techniques; Simulation Modelling; D40, Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: General; Q40, Energy: General

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Energy Journal
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01956574261460196
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Model-Based Analysis of the AggregateEU Mechanism: Implications of Overbidding and Non-Commitment

László Á. Kóczy, Anne Neumann, Dávid Csercsik, Borbála Takácsné Tóth et al.
The Energy Journal
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

A Model-Based Analysis of the AggregateEU Mechanism: Implications of Overbidding and Non-Commitment

László Á. Kóczy, Anne Neumann, Dávid Csercsik, Borbála Takácsné Tóth, Péter Kotek
article en

Abstract

AggregateEU is a new centralised mechanism that provides a no-commitment platform to trade natural gas in the European Union. Throughout the consultation process, AggregateEU has been mocked as ‘Tinder of the European gas markets’ as it helps consumers and suppliers find partners, but leaves it up to the matched partners to decide whether to contract for potential trade. The non-commitment nature leads to substantial overbidding and many non-realised matches. We propose a quantitative modelling framework to study the effect of overbidding in the AggergateEU demand aggregation or joint purchasing mechanism. We conclude that the mechanism is prone to overbidding and that overbidding has ambiguous effects on trade. Depending on the parameters, overbidding may facilitate trade, but may also result in highly inefficient outcomes when overbidding is combined with miscoordination over the delivery points. Suggested remedies include allowing for convex bids, restrictions on overbidding or giving up part of the non-binding character of the market. Our results suggest that a potential future mechanism allowing the coordination of multiple delivery points could enhance the efficiency of gas markets. JEL Classification : C72, Noncooperative Games; C63, Computational Techniques; Simulation Modelling; D40, Market Structure, Pricing, and Design: General; Q40, Energy: General

The Energy Journal
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), Pázmány Péter Catholic University (HU), ELTE Centre for Economic and Regional Studies (HU), HUN-REN Centre for Energy Research (HU)
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.