The Evolution of Flower Beetles as Visitors and Pollinators

An estimated 20% of about 400,000 species of beetles (Coleoptera) are flower visitors. Despite this huge taxonomic and natural history diversity, beetle-flower interactions have historically been overlooked and summarized as inefficient mess-and-soil pollinators associated with an easily recognizable flower syndrome. Here, we combine classical and artificial intelligence-supported review methods to discuss the reasons for this neglect, which include biased documentation and pervasive views that reflect only a subset of beetle-flower interactions. We review general trends in extant and fossil flower beetle morphology, behavior, and diversity, as well as the diversity of the flowers they visit. We discuss how the fossil record and molecular phylogenetics show both ancient associations preceding angiosperm dominance and numerous cases of derived associations leading to more recent diversification. The context dependency of beetle-flower interaction outcomes and their pervasiveness could be leveraged to improve our understanding of insect diversification processes and the costs and benefits of different pollination systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Entomology
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-121423-013404
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of Flower Beetles as Visitors and Pollinators

David Peris, Bruno A.S. de Medeiros
3 citations
Annual Review of Entomology
Plant and animal studies
9.08
article

The Evolution of Flower Beetles as Visitors and Pollinators

David Peris, Bruno A.S. de Medeiros
article en
3 citations

Abstract

An estimated 20% of about 400,000 species of beetles (Coleoptera) are flower visitors. Despite this huge taxonomic and natural history diversity, beetle-flower interactions have historically been overlooked and summarized as inefficient mess-and-soil pollinators associated with an easily recognizable flower syndrome. Here, we combine classical and artificial intelligence-supported review methods to discuss the reasons for this neglect, which include biased documentation and pervasive views that reflect only a subset of beetle-flower interactions. We review general trends in extant and fossil flower beetle morphology, behavior, and diversity, as well as the diversity of the flowers they visit. We discuss how the fossil record and molecular phylogenetics show both ancient associations preceding angiosperm dominance and numerous cases of derived associations leading to more recent diversification. The context dependency of beetle-flower interaction outcomes and their pervasiveness could be leveraged to improve our understanding of insect diversification processes and the costs and benefits of different pollination systems.

Annual Review of EntomologyVol. 71(1)
Field Museum of Natural History (US), Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant and animal studies
9.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.