Data-driven lithofacies prediction of unconsolidated sediments from wireline logs

Detailed knowledge of the lithostratigraphy of unconsolidated sediments is essential for many scientific and industrial applications. Although drill cores provide lithological and petrophysical information (e.g., lithofacies, permeability, consolidation), core recovery is time- and resource-intensive. In contrast, flush drillings are faster and less expensive but lack detailed geological context. Therefore, combining the advantages of both methods can significantly enhance subsurface investigations while reducing reliance on costly core drillings. This study explores the use of unsupervised machine learning to build data-driven stratigraphic models from standard petrophysical and geochemical wireline logging data. Specifically, it applies dimensionality reduction (UMAP) and hierarchical clustering to identify distinct lithofacies types. The method was tested on datasets from the former Rhine Glacier area in Germany, including one core-controlled well and a nearby flush-drilled borehole. The developed workflow predicted the lithofacies of the core-controlled well with ~76% accuracy, capturing both major stratigraphic units and finer internal features, directly linking them with the geology identified at the drilled site. This allows linking the reconstructed lithology of the core-controlled well with the flush-drilled well. The results demonstrate that unsupervised machine learning can significantly improve stratigraphic models of unconsolidated Quaternary sediments using wireline logs, with minimal dependence on core data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sedimentologika
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57035/journals/sdk.2025.e31.1819
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-driven lithofacies prediction of unconsolidated sediments from wireline logs

Bennet Schuster, Marius W. Buechi, David Mair, P. Becerra et al.
Sedimentologika
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Data-driven lithofacies prediction of unconsolidated sediments from wireline logs

Bennet Schuster, Marius W. Buechi, David Mair, P. Becerra, Flavio S. Anselmetti, Mehrdad Sardar Abadi, Sebastian Schaller, Sarah Beraus
article en

Abstract

Detailed knowledge of the lithostratigraphy of unconsolidated sediments is essential for many scientific and industrial applications. Although drill cores provide lithological and petrophysical information (e.g., lithofacies, permeability, consolidation), core recovery is time- and resource-intensive. In contrast, flush drillings are faster and less expensive but lack detailed geological context. Therefore, combining the advantages of both methods can significantly enhance subsurface investigations while reducing reliance on costly core drillings. This study explores the use of unsupervised machine learning to build data-driven stratigraphic models from standard petrophysical and geochemical wireline logging data. Specifically, it applies dimensionality reduction (UMAP) and hierarchical clustering to identify distinct lithofacies types. The method was tested on datasets from the former Rhine Glacier area in Germany, including one core-controlled well and a nearby flush-drilled borehole. The developed workflow predicted the lithofacies of the core-controlled well with ~76% accuracy, capturing both major stratigraphic units and finer internal features, directly linking them with the geology identified at the drilled site. This allows linking the reconstructed lithology of the core-controlled well with the flush-drilled well. The results demonstrate that unsupervised machine learning can significantly improve stratigraphic models of unconsolidated Quaternary sediments using wireline logs, with minimal dependence on core data.

SedimentologikaVol. 3(1)
University of Bern (CH), Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (CH), Institute of Applied Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences (RU), LIAG Institute for Applied Geophysics (DE)
University of Bern, Strong, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Leibniz-Institut für Angewandte Geophysik, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Eidgenössisches Nuklearsicherheitsinspektorat, Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.