Creating and Evaluating Personas Using Generative AI: A Scoping Review of 81 Articles

As generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly applied in persona development to represent real users, understanding the implications and limitations of this technology is essential for establishing robust practices. This scoping review analyzes how 81 articles (2022-2025) use GenAI techniques for the creation, evaluation, and application of personas. The articles exhibited good level of reproducibility, with 61% of articles sharing resources (personas, code, or datasets). Furthermore, conversational persona interfaces are increasingly provided alongside traditional profiles. However, nearly half (45%) of the articles lack evaluation, and the majority (86%) use only GPT models. In some articles, GenAI use creates a risk of circularity, in which the same GenAI model both generates and evaluates outputs. Our findings also suggest that GenAI seems to reduce the role of human developers in the persona-creation process. To mitigate the associated risks, we propose actionable guidelines for the responsible integration of GenAI into persona development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790608
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Persona Design and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating and Evaluating Personas Using Generative AI: A Scoping Review of 81 Articles

Bernard J. Jim Jansen, Joni O. Salminen, Sonja M.H. Tervola
1 citations
Persona Design and Applications
27.54
article

Creating and Evaluating Personas Using Generative AI: A Scoping Review of 81 Articles

Bernard J. Jim Jansen, Joni O. Salminen, Sonja M.H. Tervola
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly applied in persona development to represent real users, understanding the implications and limitations of this technology is essential for establishing robust practices. This scoping review analyzes how 81 articles (2022-2025) use GenAI techniques for the creation, evaluation, and application of personas. The articles exhibited good level of reproducibility, with 61% of articles sharing resources (personas, code, or datasets). Furthermore, conversational persona interfaces are increasingly provided alongside traditional profiles. However, nearly half (45%) of the articles lack evaluation, and the majority (86%) use only GPT models. In some articles, GenAI use creates a risk of circularity, in which the same GenAI model both generates and evaluates outputs. Our findings also suggest that GenAI seems to reduce the role of human developers in the persona-creation process. To mitigate the associated risks, we propose actionable guidelines for the responsible integration of GenAI into persona development.

University of Arizona (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), University of Vaasa (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Persona Design and Applications
27.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.