Numerical investigation on the sensitivity of sampling representativeness in a nuclear facility stack

• CFD framework established under ISO 2889:2023 for stack sampling assessment. • Aerosol flow rate identified as the dominant factor affecting representativeness. • Inlet velocity increase (2–20 m/s) reduces velocity COV by about 35 % • Enlarging diameter (0.8–1.6 m) lowers outlet velocity and improves flow uniformity. • Quantitative results provide design guidance for nuclear stack monitoring systems. The sampling representativeness in a nuclear facility stack was numerically investigated within the ISO 2889:2023 framework, using the coefficients of variation (COV) of velocity and aerosol concentration, together with the angle of flow, as key evaluation metrics. A four-factor sensitivity study—stack height, diameter, inlet velocity, and aerosol flow rate—was conducted to quantify their effects on sampling criteria at the 37–40 m sections. Increasing the inlet velocity from 2 to 20 m/s reduced the velocity COV by approximately 30–40 % owing to enhanced turbulent mixing. Enlarging the stack diameter (0.8–1.6 m) decreased the outlet velocity by about 55 % and reduced velocity COV by 15–20 %, though the improvement became negligible beyond 1.4 m. Within the height range of 9–15 m, the velocity COV remained around 5 %, suggesting a minor influence of height. In contrast, increasing the aerosol flow rate from 0.001 to 0.1 kg/s raised the concentration COV from 5–6 % to 13.4 %, substantially degrading representativeness. This demonstrates that excessive aerosol injection can markedly degrade sampling representativeness through localized enrichment and agglomeration effects. All simulated configurations met ISO 2889:2023 representativeness requirements (velocity COV ≤ 20 %, angle of flow ≤ 20°). These quantitative results identify aerosol flow rate and inlet velocity as the dominant parameters controlling sampling performance, while height and diameter have secondary roles with diminishing returns once geometric development is sufficient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111991
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical investigation on the sensitivity of sampling representativeness in a nuclear facility stack

Zifang Guo, Hao Zhou, Qingxin Lei, Yizhi Chen et al.
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Numerical investigation on the sensitivity of sampling representativeness in a nuclear facility stack

Zifang Guo, Hao Zhou, Qingxin Lei, Yizhi Chen, Chenyu Shan, Xiajie Liu, Chunyu Liu, Fusheng Yang, Feng Liu
article en

Abstract

• CFD framework established under ISO 2889:2023 for stack sampling assessment. • Aerosol flow rate identified as the dominant factor affecting representativeness. • Inlet velocity increase (2–20 m/s) reduces velocity COV by about 35 % • Enlarging diameter (0.8–1.6 m) lowers outlet velocity and improves flow uniformity. • Quantitative results provide design guidance for nuclear stack monitoring systems. The sampling representativeness in a nuclear facility stack was numerically investigated within the ISO 2889:2023 framework, using the coefficients of variation (COV) of velocity and aerosol concentration, together with the angle of flow, as key evaluation metrics. A four-factor sensitivity study—stack height, diameter, inlet velocity, and aerosol flow rate—was conducted to quantify their effects on sampling criteria at the 37–40 m sections. Increasing the inlet velocity from 2 to 20 m/s reduced the velocity COV by approximately 30–40 % owing to enhanced turbulent mixing. Enlarging the stack diameter (0.8–1.6 m) decreased the outlet velocity by about 55 % and reduced velocity COV by 15–20 %, though the improvement became negligible beyond 1.4 m. Within the height range of 9–15 m, the velocity COV remained around 5 %, suggesting a minor influence of height. In contrast, increasing the aerosol flow rate from 0.001 to 0.1 kg/s raised the concentration COV from 5–6 % to 13.4 %, substantially degrading representativeness. This demonstrates that excessive aerosol injection can markedly degrade sampling representativeness through localized enrichment and agglomeration effects. All simulated configurations met ISO 2889:2023 representativeness requirements (velocity COV ≤ 20 %, angle of flow ≤ 20°). These quantitative results identify aerosol flow rate and inlet velocity as the dominant parameters controlling sampling performance, while height and diameter have secondary roles with diminishing returns once geometric development is sufficient.

Annals of Nuclear EnergyVol. 227
China General Nuclear Power Corporation (China) (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.