Work for self or others? Two different kinds of burnout in China

Although much research has been done on occupational burnout, most studies focus on employees (EM), with insufficient attention given to the self-employed (SE). This study adopts a novel quantitative approach using methods like the entropy weight method, multiple linear regression, and the Boruta algorithm to analyze burnout differences between EM and SE. Results indicate that EM are more influenced by stress and external, deficiency-induced burnout, while SE are driven by interest and internal, imbalance-induced burnout. Social network support is a key factor in predicting burnout for both groups. Interestingly, increased financial support from family raises burnout risk for EM, while greater social network support increases burnout risk for SE. These findings reflect inherent differences in work patterns and resource mobilization strategies. This research expands the application of the Job Demands-Resources model and provides insights for tailored mental health interventions across different occupational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334394
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work for self or others? Two different kinds of burnout in China

Yingying Xia, Mengjiao Yin
PLoS ONE
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Work for self or others? Two different kinds of burnout in China

Yingying Xia, Mengjiao Yin
article en

Abstract

Although much research has been done on occupational burnout, most studies focus on employees (EM), with insufficient attention given to the self-employed (SE). This study adopts a novel quantitative approach using methods like the entropy weight method, multiple linear regression, and the Boruta algorithm to analyze burnout differences between EM and SE. Results indicate that EM are more influenced by stress and external, deficiency-induced burnout, while SE are driven by interest and internal, imbalance-induced burnout. Social network support is a key factor in predicting burnout for both groups. Interestingly, increased financial support from family raises burnout risk for EM, while greater social network support increases burnout risk for SE. These findings reflect inherent differences in work patterns and resource mobilization strategies. This research expands the application of the Job Demands-Resources model and provides insights for tailored mental health interventions across different occupational contexts.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(11)
Wuxi Taihu Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Government of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.