Ethnic Disparities in CKD Progression

Key Points Risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with CKD group than that in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort group. Asian cohorts exhibited steeper eGFR decline slopes than that of the Black and White cohorts. Tailored clinical approaches and ethnicity-stratified studies are required to improve CKD management. Background Ethnic differences in CKD progression remain understudied, particularly between Asian and Western populations. Therefore, we aimed to investigate ethnic disparities in CKD progression by comparing nationwide cohorts from South Korea (the KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with CKD [KNOW-CKD]) and the United States (the US Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort [CRIC]). Methods A total of 4953 participants were included (69% from CRIC and 31% from KNOW-CKD). The primary outcome was CKD progression, defined as a 50% or greater decline of eGFR or kidney failure requiring KRT. In the secondary outcome analysis, we compared eGFR decline rates and all-cause mortality. Results Of the 4953 participants, CKD progression occurred in 1285 and 570 in the KNOW-CKD and CRIC cohorts, with incidence rates of 67.9 and 41.7 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The hazard ratio for the KNOW-CKD compared with CRIC was 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 1.89). The annual eGFR decline was steeper in KNOW-CKD participants than in CRIC participants (−2.51 versus −1.14 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ). Asian participants from the CRIC cohort exhibited a similar eGFR slope (95% CIs) (−2.10 [−2.69 to −1.52]) to those from KNOW-CKD (−2.50 [−2.67 to −1.52]), while the slope was −1.47 (−1.61 to −1.33) and −0.81 (−0.92 to −0.70) ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year for Black and White participants, respectively. However, the risk of mortality was significantly lower in KNOW-CKD participants compared with CRIC participants (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68). Conclusions CKD progression was faster in the Korean cohort than in the US cohort, with Asian participants in both cohorts showing similar eGFR decline rates. However, the Korean cohort had a lower risk of mortality, indicating potential ethnic or regional differences in disease progression and survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000884
Primary Topic
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnic Disparities in CKD Progression

Chan‐Young Jung, Shin‐Wook Kang, Mahboob Rahman, Jong Cheol Jeong et al.
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
article

Ethnic Disparities in CKD Progression

Chan‐Young Jung, Shin‐Wook Kang, Mahboob Rahman, Jong Cheol Jeong, Ye Eun Ko, Hee Byung Koh, Seung Hyeok Han, Ga Young Heo, Kook‐Hwan Oh, Tae Ik Chang, Ji Yong Jung, Yaeni Kim, Tae‐Hyun Yoo, Jordana B. Cohen, Amanda H. Anderson, Cheol Ho Park, Sue K. Park, Hyung Woo Kim, Wei Peter Yang, Jung Tak Park, Byounghwi Ko, Donna Kang
article en

Abstract

Key Points Risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with CKD group than that in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort group. Asian cohorts exhibited steeper eGFR decline slopes than that of the Black and White cohorts. Tailored clinical approaches and ethnicity-stratified studies are required to improve CKD management. Background Ethnic differences in CKD progression remain understudied, particularly between Asian and Western populations. Therefore, we aimed to investigate ethnic disparities in CKD progression by comparing nationwide cohorts from South Korea (the KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with CKD [KNOW-CKD]) and the United States (the US Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort [CRIC]). Methods A total of 4953 participants were included (69% from CRIC and 31% from KNOW-CKD). The primary outcome was CKD progression, defined as a 50% or greater decline of eGFR or kidney failure requiring KRT. In the secondary outcome analysis, we compared eGFR decline rates and all-cause mortality. Results Of the 4953 participants, CKD progression occurred in 1285 and 570 in the KNOW-CKD and CRIC cohorts, with incidence rates of 67.9 and 41.7 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The hazard ratio for the KNOW-CKD compared with CRIC was 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45 to 1.89). The annual eGFR decline was steeper in KNOW-CKD participants than in CRIC participants (−2.51 versus −1.14 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ). Asian participants from the CRIC cohort exhibited a similar eGFR slope (95% CIs) (−2.10 [−2.69 to −1.52]) to those from KNOW-CKD (−2.50 [−2.67 to −1.52]), while the slope was −1.47 (−1.61 to −1.33) and −0.81 (−0.92 to −0.70) ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year for Black and White participants, respectively. However, the risk of mortality was significantly lower in KNOW-CKD participants compared with CRIC participants (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.68). Conclusions CKD progression was faster in the Korean cohort than in the US cohort, with Asian participants in both cohorts showing similar eGFR decline rates. However, the Korean cohort had a lower risk of mortality, indicating potential ethnic or regional differences in disease progression and survival.

Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 21(2)
Tulane University (US), Ulsan College (KR), Seoul National University (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Korea University (KR), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Asan Medical Center (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Gachon University Gil Medical Center (KR), National Health Insurance Service (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.