Self-Organization Response in a Crisis: A Case Study of a Shanghai Community during COVID-19 in 2022

This study examines how self-organizing groups function during crisis response in China’s centralized system. Through case analysis of a Shanghai community during COVID-19, we investigate how emergent citizen groups establish legitimate relationships with administrative structures, what mechanisms enable their adaptability, and how key actors facilitate coordination. Integrating complex adaptive systems and institutional theories, we propose that self-organizing groups emerge through resource integration and social mobilization when crisis demands exceed governance capacity; develop as collective entities bridging formal administration and communities; and rely on key actors balancing formal rules with local solutions. Our findings reveal a five-phase evolution where mutual aid groups developed specialized capabilities while maintaining institutional legitimacy. This suggests how self-organizing groups can comply with institutional frameworks while enabling innovation in centralized systems, offering insights for emergency management practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Hazards Review
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2504
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Organization Response in a Crisis: A Case Study of a Shanghai Community during COVID-19 in 2022

Wu Chen, Haibo Zhang
Natural Hazards Review
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Self-Organization Response in a Crisis: A Case Study of a Shanghai Community during COVID-19 in 2022

Wu Chen, Haibo Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study examines how self-organizing groups function during crisis response in China’s centralized system. Through case analysis of a Shanghai community during COVID-19, we investigate how emergent citizen groups establish legitimate relationships with administrative structures, what mechanisms enable their adaptability, and how key actors facilitate coordination. Integrating complex adaptive systems and institutional theories, we propose that self-organizing groups emerge through resource integration and social mobilization when crisis demands exceed governance capacity; develop as collective entities bridging formal administration and communities; and rely on key actors balancing formal rules with local solutions. Our findings reveal a five-phase evolution where mutual aid groups developed specialized capabilities while maintaining institutional legitimacy. This suggests how self-organizing groups can comply with institutional frameworks while enabling innovation in centralized systems, offering insights for emergency management practice.

Natural Hazards ReviewVol. 27(1)
Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.