The cognitive architecture of degraded speech intelligibility

{"Accurate":[0],"speech":[1,9,33,101,146],"understanding":[2],"is":[3,10,35,139],"crucial":[4],"in":[5,49],"everyday":[6],"life.":[7],"Yet,":[8],"often":[11],"degraded":[12,32,48,100,145],"by":[13,37,132],"a":[14,78],"variety":[15],"of":[16,81,112,120],"talker":[17],"and":[18,52,66,105,136],"environmental":[19],"factors,":[20],"which":[21],"listeners":[22],"must":[23],"overcome.":[24],"In":[25,59,91],"this":[26],"online":[27],"experiment,":[28],"we":[29],"assess":[30,70,87],"how":[31],"intelligibility":[34],"supported":[36],"\\"elemental\\"":[38],"cognitive":[39,96,142],"processes.":[40],"Eighty-nine":[41],"healthy":[42],"adults":[43],"listened":[44],"to":[45,69,86],"spoken":[46],"sentences":[47],"five":[50],"ways":[51],"reported":[53],"the":[54,63,110,116,126,133,140],"words":[55],"that":[56,109,128],"they":[57,61],"heard.":[58],"addition,":[60],"completed":[62],"Reading":[64,134],"Span":[65,135],"N-back":[67],"tasks":[68],"working":[71],"memory":[72],"capacity":[73],"(WM),":[74],"as":[75,77,130],"well":[76],"short":[79],"version":[80],"Raven's":[82],"Advanced":[83],"Progressive":[84],"Matrices":[85],"fluid":[88,113],"reasoning":[89,114],"ability.":[90],"bivariate":[92],"correlational":[93],"analyses,":[94],"all":[95],"test":[97,111],"scores":[98],"predicted":[99],"intelligibility.":[102,121,147],"However,":[103],"multivariate":[104],"dominance":[106],"analyses":[107],"revealed":[108],"was":[115],"most":[117],"important":[118],"predictor":[119],"These":[122],"results":[123],"may":[124],"undermine":[125],"assumption":[127],"WM,":[129],"measured":[131],"other":[137],"tasks,":[138],"primary":[141],"construct":[143],"supporting":[144]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106692
Primary Topic
Stuttering Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The cognitive architecture of degraded speech intelligibility

Stephen C. Van Hedger, Joseph Rovetti, Ingrid S. Johnsrude
Cognition
Stuttering Research and Treatment
article

The cognitive architecture of degraded speech intelligibility

Stephen C. Van Hedger, Joseph Rovetti, Ingrid S. Johnsrude
article en

Abstract

Accurate speech understanding is crucial in everyday life. Yet, speech is often degraded by a variety of talker and environmental factors, which listeners must overcome. In this online experiment, we assess how degraded speech intelligibility is supported by "elemental" cognitive processes. Eighty-nine healthy adults listened to spoken sentences degraded in five ways and reported the words that they heard. In addition, they completed the Reading Span and N-back tasks to assess working memory capacity (WM), as well as a short version of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices to assess fluid reasoning ability. In bivariate correlational analyses, all cognitive test scores predicted degraded speech intelligibility. However, multivariate and dominance analyses revealed that the test of fluid reasoning was the most important predictor of intelligibility. These results may undermine the assumption that WM, as measured by the Reading Span and other tasks, is the primary cognitive construct supporting degraded speech intelligibility.

CognitionVol. 277
Western University (CA)
Canada First Research Excellence Fund, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Stuttering Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.