Intercomparison of Data Products for Studying Trends in PM2.5 and Ozone Air Quality over Space and Time in China: Implications for Sustainable Air Quality Management

Clean air is listed by the United Nations under several Sustainable Development Goals. Particulate matter (PM2.5) and ground-level ozone (O3) are pollutants with severe public health and environmental impacts. In China, multiple fine-scale datasets integrating ground monitors, satellites, and chemical transport models have been developed to estimate PM2.5 and O3 concentrations, but differences between the fine-scale datasets complicate applications in exposure and policy research. This study presents the first systematic intercomparison of five PM2.5 datasets (V5.GL.03, Ma et al. 2021, Huang et al. 2021, CHAP, TAP) and two O3 datasets (CHAP, TAP) from 2014 to 2023, evaluated against ground-based observations at national, regional, and provincial levels. We present both operational (single time point) and dynamic (change over time) evaluations to understand how model results compare with observations for each year, and quantify the performances of the models in assessing long term changes in air quality. Results show nationwide declines in PM2.5 (by 22.1 µgm−3; regional range: 8.4–30.1 µgm−3) and O3 (by 28.5 µgm−3; regional range: 19.3–34.3 µgm−3). Operational and dynamic evaluation shows that CHAP consistently has higher R2 (greater than 0.7 in all regions) and lower errors (less than 3.7 µgm−3 in all regions) compared to other datasets across most years and regions for PM2.5. The same is true for TAP for O3 (R2 greater than 0.3 and ME less than 28.6 µgm−3 in all regions). However, the model performances vary spatially and temporally in alignment with several factors ranging from the number of observational monitors in a location, to recent changes in pollutant concentration levels, to extreme meteorological conditions. For example, higher predictive errors (>3.6 µgm−3) in operational evaluations are observed in all datasets for PM2.5 in the sparsely monitored northwest region. Similarly, we find higher errors (ME > 28.5 µgm−3) in all O3 datasets in the densely populated northern region, especially in the heavily industrialized Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intercomparison of Data Products for Studying Trends in PM2.5 and Ozone Air Quality over Space and Time in China: Implications for Sustainable Air Quality Management

Lucas Henneman, Shreya Guha
1 citations
Sustainability
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
article

Intercomparison of Data Products for Studying Trends in PM2.5 and Ozone Air Quality over Space and Time in China: Implications for Sustainable Air Quality Management

Lucas Henneman, Shreya Guha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Clean air is listed by the United Nations under several Sustainable Development Goals. Particulate matter (PM2.5) and ground-level ozone (O3) are pollutants with severe public health and environmental impacts. In China, multiple fine-scale datasets integrating ground monitors, satellites, and chemical transport models have been developed to estimate PM2.5 and O3 concentrations, but differences between the fine-scale datasets complicate applications in exposure and policy research. This study presents the first systematic intercomparison of five PM2.5 datasets (V5.GL.03, Ma et al. 2021, Huang et al. 2021, CHAP, TAP) and two O3 datasets (CHAP, TAP) from 2014 to 2023, evaluated against ground-based observations at national, regional, and provincial levels. We present both operational (single time point) and dynamic (change over time) evaluations to understand how model results compare with observations for each year, and quantify the performances of the models in assessing long term changes in air quality. Results show nationwide declines in PM2.5 (by 22.1 µgm−3; regional range: 8.4–30.1 µgm−3) and O3 (by 28.5 µgm−3; regional range: 19.3–34.3 µgm−3). Operational and dynamic evaluation shows that CHAP consistently has higher R2 (greater than 0.7 in all regions) and lower errors (less than 3.7 µgm−3 in all regions) compared to other datasets across most years and regions for PM2.5. The same is true for TAP for O3 (R2 greater than 0.3 and ME less than 28.6 µgm−3 in all regions). However, the model performances vary spatially and temporally in alignment with several factors ranging from the number of observational monitors in a location, to recent changes in pollutant concentration levels, to extreme meteorological conditions. For example, higher predictive errors (>3.6 µgm−3) in operational evaluations are observed in all datasets for PM2.5 in the sparsely monitored northwest region. Similarly, we find higher errors (ME > 28.5 µgm−3) in all O3 datasets in the densely populated northern region, especially in the heavily industrialized Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) area.

SustainabilityVol. 17(22)
George Mason University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.