Microbiological and physical evaluation of nonfat set-type hybrid yogurts formulated with soy and rice proteins

• Hybrid yogurts represent a sustainable strategy to diversify protein sources • High-protein hybrid yogurts blending dairy and plant-based proteins were developed • Plant protein source impacted hybrid yogurts’ texture and stability • Soy protein accelerated fermentation, maintaining texture and microbial viability • Rice protein reduced gel strength, increased syneresis, and weakened structure This study aimed to investigate the impact of incorporating soy protein isolate (SPI) and rice protein isolate (RPI) on the microbiological, physicochemical, and structural properties of high-protein, nonfat, set-type hybrid yogurts. Yogurts were formulated to contain 6% total protein, consisting of 3% protein from skim milk powder and an additional 3% from whey protein concentrate, and/or the selected plant proteins in varying proportions. The fermentation process was driven by Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, and the yogurt samples were monitored over a 14-day refrigerated storage period. Yogurts containing SPI exhibited the fastest acidification (3.5 h to reach pH 4.5) and the highest bacterial counts at day 0 (∼9.8 log CFU/g). Conversely, RPI-containing yogurts required a longer fermentation time (∼5 h) and exhibited lower microbial viability (∼8.6 log CFU/g). After 14 days, all samples remained above 7 log CFU/g, confirming starter stability during storage. Physicochemical and structural analyses showed that Y-S developed a branched, less dense and more porous protein network than the dairy control (Y-W), whereas Y-WS (with 1.5% WPC + 1.5% SPI added proteins) exhibited an intermediate microstructure. SPI-containing formulations displayed texture parameters (firmness, consistency, cohesiveness) closest to the control, while RPI led to a weaker gel and higher syneresis (up to 15% spontaneous and 64% forced). Overall, hybrid yogurts containing soy proteins showed superior texture and stability, and faster fermentation. Although both plant proteins can be incorporated into dairy matrices, further optimization is required to achieve the desired texture and stability in high-protein hybrid yogurts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Foods
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2025.100835
Primary Topic
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbiological and physical evaluation of nonfat set-type hybrid yogurts formulated with soy and rice proteins

Eliana Budelli, Ana Curutchet, Mariana Rodríguez Arzuaga, María Paula Méndez‐Galarraga et al.
Future Foods
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
article

Microbiological and physical evaluation of nonfat set-type hybrid yogurts formulated with soy and rice proteins

Eliana Budelli, Ana Curutchet, Mariana Rodríguez Arzuaga, María Paula Méndez‐Galarraga, Andrés Di Paolo, Carolina Oliveira‐Rizzo
article en

Abstract

• Hybrid yogurts represent a sustainable strategy to diversify protein sources • High-protein hybrid yogurts blending dairy and plant-based proteins were developed • Plant protein source impacted hybrid yogurts’ texture and stability • Soy protein accelerated fermentation, maintaining texture and microbial viability • Rice protein reduced gel strength, increased syneresis, and weakened structure This study aimed to investigate the impact of incorporating soy protein isolate (SPI) and rice protein isolate (RPI) on the microbiological, physicochemical, and structural properties of high-protein, nonfat, set-type hybrid yogurts. Yogurts were formulated to contain 6% total protein, consisting of 3% protein from skim milk powder and an additional 3% from whey protein concentrate, and/or the selected plant proteins in varying proportions. The fermentation process was driven by Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, and the yogurt samples were monitored over a 14-day refrigerated storage period. Yogurts containing SPI exhibited the fastest acidification (3.5 h to reach pH 4.5) and the highest bacterial counts at day 0 (∼9.8 log CFU/g). Conversely, RPI-containing yogurts required a longer fermentation time (∼5 h) and exhibited lower microbial viability (∼8.6 log CFU/g). After 14 days, all samples remained above 7 log CFU/g, confirming starter stability during storage. Physicochemical and structural analyses showed that Y-S developed a branched, less dense and more porous protein network than the dairy control (Y-W), whereas Y-WS (with 1.5% WPC + 1.5% SPI added proteins) exhibited an intermediate microstructure. SPI-containing formulations displayed texture parameters (firmness, consistency, cohesiveness) closest to the control, while RPI led to a weaker gel and higher syneresis (up to 15% spontaneous and 64% forced). Overall, hybrid yogurts containing soy proteins showed superior texture and stability, and faster fermentation. Although both plant proteins can be incorporated into dairy matrices, further optimization is required to achieve the desired texture and stability in high-protein hybrid yogurts.

Future FoodsVol. 12
Universidad de la República de Uruguay (UY), Universidad Católica del Uruguay (UY), RedCLARA (UY), Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable (UY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.