Civilizing the colonial soundscape: space and the regulation of Chinese street noise in nineteenth-century Hong Kong

Abstract In 1872, Hong Kong’s colonial government passed an ordinance prohibiting hawkers from crying wares in the parts of town where Europeans lived and worked. This was precipitated by a local discourse on ostensibly Chinese noise that took shape in the English-language newspapers that constructed Chinese people as intrinsically noisy and Europeans as noise averse. These ideas drew upon existing rhetoric produced in response to noise nuisance in London and a broader transatlantic discourse on the relationship between noise and civilization. The transformation of these ideas in Hong Kong established a model whereby Chinese people were producers of noise, unaffected by hearing it, while intrinsically quiet Europeans suffered from hearing noise. This process justified the differential treatment of space, enabling the creation of a privileged ‘European’ zone legally protected from ‘Chinese’ noise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban History
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963926825100473
Primary Topic
Sound Studies and Aurality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Civilizing the colonial soundscape: space and the regulation of Chinese street noise in nineteenth-century Hong Kong

L. Nicole Vaughan
Urban History
Sound Studies and Aurality
article

Civilizing the colonial soundscape: space and the regulation of Chinese street noise in nineteenth-century Hong Kong

L. Nicole Vaughan
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 1872, Hong Kong’s colonial government passed an ordinance prohibiting hawkers from crying wares in the parts of town where Europeans lived and worked. This was precipitated by a local discourse on ostensibly Chinese noise that took shape in the English-language newspapers that constructed Chinese people as intrinsically noisy and Europeans as noise averse. These ideas drew upon existing rhetoric produced in response to noise nuisance in London and a broader transatlantic discourse on the relationship between noise and civilization. The transformation of these ideas in Hong Kong established a model whereby Chinese people were producers of noise, unaffected by hearing it, while intrinsically quiet Europeans suffered from hearing noise. This process justified the differential treatment of space, enabling the creation of a privileged ‘European’ zone legally protected from ‘Chinese’ noise.

Urban History
University of Hong Kong (HK)
University of St Andrews
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Sound Studies and Aurality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Civilizing the colonial soundscape: space and the regulation of Chinese street noise in nineteenth-century Hong Kong — L. Nicole Vaughan · Urban History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS