Experimental evaluation of burner cap design on energy efficiency in residential gas geysers

This research evaluates the thermal and combustion efficiencies of plate, circular, and swirl burners, with a particular focus on the influence of swirl angle on performance. The swirl burner achieved peak thermal and combustion efficiencies of 54.1 % and 75.2 %, respectively, at a 49° cap angle, where enhanced turbulence and improved air-fuel mixing minimized CO emissions to 0.0027 % corresponding to 27 ppm, dry basis, measured with a calibrated Testo 350 analyzer. This low CO concentration reflects optimized combustion under controlled laboratory conditions and is consistent with previously reported ranges for high-performance swirl burners. In comparison, the plate burner attained 48.97 % thermal and 47 % combustion efficiency, while the circular burner reached 46.81 % and 57 %, respectively. Other swirl angles, such as 41°, 45°, 53°, and 55°, produced lower efficiencies due to less favorable combustion dynamics or excessive airflow. These results demonstrate that geometric optimization of burner caps, particularly through swirl angle adjustment, can significantly enhance combustion efficiency, reduce emissions, and provide a practical pathway toward more energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable residential gas appliances.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108166
Primary Topic
Combustion and flame dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental evaluation of burner cap design on energy efficiency in residential gas geysers

Afzal Khan, Muhammad Sheraz, Teong Chee Chuah, Zeeshan Khan et al.
Results in Engineering
Combustion and flame dynamics
article

Experimental evaluation of burner cap design on energy efficiency in residential gas geysers

Afzal Khan, Muhammad Sheraz, Teong Chee Chuah, Zeeshan Khan, Muhammad Zulqarnain Abbasi, Wajahat Ullah Khan Tareen, Faiq Said
article en

Abstract

This research evaluates the thermal and combustion efficiencies of plate, circular, and swirl burners, with a particular focus on the influence of swirl angle on performance. The swirl burner achieved peak thermal and combustion efficiencies of 54.1 % and 75.2 %, respectively, at a 49° cap angle, where enhanced turbulence and improved air-fuel mixing minimized CO emissions to 0.0027 % corresponding to 27 ppm, dry basis, measured with a calibrated Testo 350 analyzer. This low CO concentration reflects optimized combustion under controlled laboratory conditions and is consistent with previously reported ranges for high-performance swirl burners. In comparison, the plate burner attained 48.97 % thermal and 47 % combustion efficiency, while the circular burner reached 46.81 % and 57 %, respectively. Other swirl angles, such as 41°, 45°, 53°, and 55°, produced lower efficiencies due to less favorable combustion dynamics or excessive airflow. These results demonstrate that geometric optimization of burner caps, particularly through swirl angle adjustment, can significantly enhance combustion efficiency, reduce emissions, and provide a practical pathway toward more energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable residential gas appliances.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Combustion and flame dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experimental evaluation of burner cap design on energy efficiency in residential gas geysers — Afzal Khan, Muhammad Sheraz, et al. · Results in Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS