That sticky feeling: The evolution and impact of wool cooperatives in the American West, 1880–1930

Abstract This article examines wool cooperatives in the American West between 1880 and 1930, demonstrating how institutional requirements systematically transformed democratic marketing organizations through capacity-based selection pressures. Analysis of government reports and trade publications reveals that individual associations experienced extreme volatility despite aggregate growth statistics, with survival rates correlating strongly with organizational capacity. The sophisticated marketing tools that emerged – binding multiyear contracts and deferred payment structures – imposed fixed costs and liquidity demands that operated as effective membership filters, systematically excluding smaller producers. While cooperative market share peaked in the early 1920s before declining substantially by 1930, western geographic concentration increased, revealing selection by producer characteristics rather than reduced crisis motivation. This research extends the Hoffman and Libecap framework by demonstrating how internal producer heterogeneity reshaped institutional objectives despite commodity characteristics favouring broad-based cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural History
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956793325100162
Primary Topic
Cooperative Studies and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

That sticky feeling: The evolution and impact of wool cooperatives in the American West, 1880–1930

Iker Saitua
Rural History
Cooperative Studies and Economics
article

That sticky feeling: The evolution and impact of wool cooperatives in the American West, 1880–1930

Iker Saitua
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines wool cooperatives in the American West between 1880 and 1930, demonstrating how institutional requirements systematically transformed democratic marketing organizations through capacity-based selection pressures. Analysis of government reports and trade publications reveals that individual associations experienced extreme volatility despite aggregate growth statistics, with survival rates correlating strongly with organizational capacity. The sophisticated marketing tools that emerged – binding multiyear contracts and deferred payment structures – imposed fixed costs and liquidity demands that operated as effective membership filters, systematically excluding smaller producers. While cooperative market share peaked in the early 1920s before declining substantially by 1930, western geographic concentration increased, revealing selection by producer characteristics rather than reduced crisis motivation. This research extends the Hoffman and Libecap framework by demonstrating how internal producer heterogeneity reshaped institutional objectives despite commodity characteristics favouring broad-based cooperation.

Rural HistoryVol. 37(1)
University of the Basque Country (ES), Basque Center for Applied Mathematics (ES)
Eusko Jaurlaritza, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cooperative Studies and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.