Medical Data as a Key Asset in the Digital Health Era: A Framework for Challenges and Strategies

ABSTRACT In the digital health era, medical data is key to personalized medicine and population health management, but its sharing and use face challenges—making a Medical Data Element Ecosystem (MDEE) essential to unlock its full potential. This study reviews literature to compare international frameworks with Chinese initiatives and examines cases like medical consortia and cross‐border platforms. We propose the MDEE practical framework, covering micro‐level stakeholder roles/responsibilities and macro‐level progress in technological innovation, institutional reforms, and ethical governance. It identifies China's key priorities: construction of federated systems, talent and capacity building, ethical framework development, global standard participation, and digital equity assurance. The MDEE practical framework offers an integrated approach from operational to strategic levels. In addition, building this ecosystem needs managing three key relationships: multi‐stakeholder co‐creation, integration of global best practices with local innovation, and balancing data protection with innovation. By addressing these issues, China could work toward developing an MDEE that promotes data security, efficient circulation, fair value distribution, and sustainable development, potentially maximizing the value of medical data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iMetaMed
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/imm3.70014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical Data as a Key Asset in the Digital Health Era: A Framework for Challenges and Strategies

Yanqing Ding, Tianqi Chen, Hank Z. H. Wong, G.Y. Li et al.
1 citations
iMetaMed
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
article

Medical Data as a Key Asset in the Digital Health Era: A Framework for Challenges and Strategies

Yanqing Ding, Tianqi Chen, Hank Z. H. Wong, G.Y. Li, Shouzhong Ren, Anqi Lin, Yi Huang, Lin Zhang, Weiye Qian, Jian Wang, Changqi Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the digital health era, medical data is key to personalized medicine and population health management, but its sharing and use face challenges—making a Medical Data Element Ecosystem (MDEE) essential to unlock its full potential. This study reviews literature to compare international frameworks with Chinese initiatives and examines cases like medical consortia and cross‐border platforms. We propose the MDEE practical framework, covering micro‐level stakeholder roles/responsibilities and macro‐level progress in technological innovation, institutional reforms, and ethical governance. It identifies China's key priorities: construction of federated systems, talent and capacity building, ethical framework development, global standard participation, and digital equity assurance. The MDEE practical framework offers an integrated approach from operational to strategic levels. In addition, building this ecosystem needs managing three key relationships: multi‐stakeholder co‐creation, integration of global best practices with local innovation, and balancing data protection with innovation. By addressing these issues, China could work toward developing an MDEE that promotes data security, efficient circulation, fair value distribution, and sustainable development, potentially maximizing the value of medical data.

iMetaMedVol. 1(2)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Soochow University (CN), Zhujiang Hospital (CN), Suzhou Research Institute (CN), China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), Monash University (AU), Southern Medical University (CN), Southeast University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.