Radio Galaxy Zoo: morphological classification by Fanaroff–Riley designation using self-supervised pre-training

ABSTRACT In this study, we examine over 14 000 radio galaxies finely selected from Radio Galaxy Zoo (RGZ) project and provide classifications for approximately 5900 FRIs and 8100 FRIIs. We present an analysis of these predicted radio galaxy morphologies for the RGZ catalogue, classified using a pre-trained radio galaxy foundation model that has been fine-tuned to predict Fanaroff–Riley (FR) morphology. As seen in previous studies, our results show overlap between morphologically classified FRI and FRII luminosity–size distributions and we find that the model’s confidence in its predictions is lowest in this overlap region, suggesting that source morphologies are more ambiguous. We identify the presence of low-luminosity FRII sources, the proportion of which, with respect to the total number of FRIIs, is consistent with previous studies. However, a comparison of the low-luminosity FRII sources found in this work with those identified by previous studies reveals differences that may indicate their selection is influenced by the choice of classification methodology. We investigate the impacts of both pre-training and fine-tuning data selection on model performance for the downstream classification task, and show that while different pre-training data choices affect model confidence they do not appear to cause systematic generalization biases for the range of physical and observational characteristics considered in this work; however, we note that the same is not necessarily true for fine-tuning. As automated approaches to astronomical source identification and classification become increasingly prevalent, we highlight training data choices that can affect the model outputs and propagate into downstream analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1942
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radio Galaxy Zoo: morphological classification by Fanaroff–Riley designation using self-supervised pre-training

Devina Mohan, Andrew Hopkins, Micah Bowles, Nutthawara Buatthaisong et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Radio Galaxy Zoo: morphological classification by Fanaroff–Riley designation using self-supervised pre-training

Devina Mohan, Andrew Hopkins, Micah Bowles, Nutthawara Buatthaisong, Inigo Val Slijepcevic, Stanislav S. Shabala, Anna M. M. Scaife, O. Ivy Wong
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, we examine over 14 000 radio galaxies finely selected from Radio Galaxy Zoo (RGZ) project and provide classifications for approximately 5900 FRIs and 8100 FRIIs. We present an analysis of these predicted radio galaxy morphologies for the RGZ catalogue, classified using a pre-trained radio galaxy foundation model that has been fine-tuned to predict Fanaroff–Riley (FR) morphology. As seen in previous studies, our results show overlap between morphologically classified FRI and FRII luminosity–size distributions and we find that the model’s confidence in its predictions is lowest in this overlap region, suggesting that source morphologies are more ambiguous. We identify the presence of low-luminosity FRII sources, the proportion of which, with respect to the total number of FRIIs, is consistent with previous studies. However, a comparison of the low-luminosity FRII sources found in this work with those identified by previous studies reveals differences that may indicate their selection is influenced by the choice of classification methodology. We investigate the impacts of both pre-training and fine-tuning data selection on model performance for the downstream classification task, and show that while different pre-training data choices affect model confidence they do not appear to cause systematic generalization biases for the range of physical and observational characteristics considered in this work; however, we note that the same is not necessarily true for fine-tuning. As automated approaches to astronomical source identification and classification become increasingly prevalent, we highlight training data choices that can affect the model outputs and propagate into downstream analyses.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 544(4)
Turing Institute (GB), University of Tasmania (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Manchester (GB), University of Oxford (GB), The Alan Turing Institute (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Astronomy and Space (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.