Reconceptualizing learning engagement: evidence for a context-sensitive structure in STEM education

Understanding student engagement as a psychological construct remains a persistent challenge in educational psychology, particularly in higher education STEM contexts. Traditional models distinguish engagement into behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions, yet often overlook how the structure of engagement may be shaped by contextualized learning activities. This study introduces and tests a novel, activity space-based model of engagement, hypothesizing that behavioral and cognitive engagement are organized by the specific academic environments in which they occur (e.g., lectures, exams, projects, recitations). Applying new engagement survey instruments that were iteratively developed to be contextually meaningful, we first present an exploratory factor analysis applied to 1,176 students from two different courses and institutions. Then we present a confirmatory factor analysis applied to 772 students in a third course. We find that a model organized by activity contexts-rather than by behavioral and cognitive distinctions-better fits the data and generalizes across STEM disciplines. The findings challenge conventional engagement theory and support a reconceptualization of engagement as a partially context-sensitive construct. This theoretical shift has implications for psychological models of learning and for the design of more precise, equitable interventions that address varied patterns of engagement within and across STEM domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1649744
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconceptualizing learning engagement: evidence for a context-sensitive structure in STEM education

Linda DeAngelo, Allison Godwin, Christian Dieter Schunn, Eric McChesney et al.
Frontiers in Psychology
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Reconceptualizing learning engagement: evidence for a context-sensitive structure in STEM education

Linda DeAngelo, Allison Godwin, Christian Dieter Schunn, Eric McChesney, Gerard Dorvè‐Lewis
article en

Abstract

Understanding student engagement as a psychological construct remains a persistent challenge in educational psychology, particularly in higher education STEM contexts. Traditional models distinguish engagement into behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions, yet often overlook how the structure of engagement may be shaped by contextualized learning activities. This study introduces and tests a novel, activity space-based model of engagement, hypothesizing that behavioral and cognitive engagement are organized by the specific academic environments in which they occur (e.g., lectures, exams, projects, recitations). Applying new engagement survey instruments that were iteratively developed to be contextually meaningful, we first present an exploratory factor analysis applied to 1,176 students from two different courses and institutions. Then we present a confirmatory factor analysis applied to 772 students in a third course. We find that a model organized by activity contexts-rather than by behavioral and cognitive distinctions-better fits the data and generalizes across STEM disciplines. The findings challenge conventional engagement theory and support a reconceptualization of engagement as a partially context-sensitive construct. This theoretical shift has implications for psychological models of learning and for the design of more precise, equitable interventions that address varied patterns of engagement within and across STEM domains.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
University of Pittsburgh (US), Cornell University (US), Pittsburgh Foundation (US)
National Science Foundation, Institute of Education Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.