When Topics of Protest and Counter-Protest Diverge: Asymmetrical Issue Contestation in Left-Right Street Confrontations
Works on protest counter-protest dynamics tend to assume that protesters and counter-protesters make competing claims about the same issue. This paper challenges this basic assumption. Based on an original dataset on local protests in Germany, it demonstrates that events that trigger a counter-protest and the response event, that is, the counter-protest, differ significantly in the issues they address. While a range of issues elicit counter-protests, the response events generally mobilize around anti-far-right claims, even if the initial protest does not explicitly advance fascism/racism issues. We argue that the observed asymmetry results from the way counter-protests have historically emerged as a specific repertoire used by left-wing actors to oppose fascist/racist groups and claims.
Authors
- Priska Daphi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8216-1566)
- Larissa Meier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8382-2631)
- Sebastian Haunss (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-4837)
- Jan Matti Dollbaum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3399-6137)
Institutions
- University of Fribourg (CH)
- University of Bremen (DE)
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Behavioral Scientist
- Published
- 2025-11-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642251379625
- Primary Topic
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00