When Topics of Protest and Counter-Protest Diverge: Asymmetrical Issue Contestation in Left-Right Street Confrontations

Works on protest counter-protest dynamics tend to assume that protesters and counter-protesters make competing claims about the same issue. This paper challenges this basic assumption. Based on an original dataset on local protests in Germany, it demonstrates that events that trigger a counter-protest and the response event, that is, the counter-protest, differ significantly in the issues they address. While a range of issues elicit counter-protests, the response events generally mobilize around anti-far-right claims, even if the initial protest does not explicitly advance fascism/racism issues. We argue that the observed asymmetry results from the way counter-protests have historically emerged as a specific repertoire used by left-wing actors to oppose fascist/racist groups and claims.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642251379625
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Topics of Protest and Counter-Protest Diverge: Asymmetrical Issue Contestation in Left-Right Street Confrontations

Priska Daphi, Larissa Meier, Sebastian Haunss, Jan Matti Dollbaum
American Behavioral Scientist
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

When Topics of Protest and Counter-Protest Diverge: Asymmetrical Issue Contestation in Left-Right Street Confrontations

Priska Daphi, Larissa Meier, Sebastian Haunss, Jan Matti Dollbaum
article en

Abstract

Works on protest counter-protest dynamics tend to assume that protesters and counter-protesters make competing claims about the same issue. This paper challenges this basic assumption. Based on an original dataset on local protests in Germany, it demonstrates that events that trigger a counter-protest and the response event, that is, the counter-protest, differ significantly in the issues they address. While a range of issues elicit counter-protests, the response events generally mobilize around anti-far-right claims, even if the initial protest does not explicitly advance fascism/racism issues. We argue that the observed asymmetry results from the way counter-protests have historically emerged as a specific repertoire used by left-wing actors to oppose fascist/racist groups and claims.

American Behavioral Scientist
University of Fribourg (CH), University of Bremen (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Topics of Protest and Counter-Protest Diverge: Asymmetrical Issue Contestation in Left-Right Street Confrontations — Priska Daphi, Larissa Meier, et al. · American Behavioral Scientist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS