Portfolio Regulation of Financial Institutions with Market Power

Abstract We examine how portfolio regulations affect risk sharing between financial institutions with market power. Unconstrained access to complete markets permits flexible exploitation of market power and induces inefficient risk sharing. Appropriate portfolio restrictions counteract this, improving liquidity and risk sharing by bundling securities with offsetting strategic incentives. However, excessive regulation can be counterproductive, destroying gains from trade. An application of our theory shows that cross-asset spillovers are critical for policy evaluation: in general equilibrium, risk sharing can improve even if certain asset-specific liquidity measures deteriorate. We also discuss the effects of asymmetric regulation for different institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Financial Studies
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaf095
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portfolio Regulation of Financial Institutions with Market Power

Michael Sockin, Daniel Neuhann, SeyedMahyar Sefidgaran
Review of Financial Studies
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Portfolio Regulation of Financial Institutions with Market Power

Michael Sockin, Daniel Neuhann, SeyedMahyar Sefidgaran
article en

Abstract

Abstract We examine how portfolio regulations affect risk sharing between financial institutions with market power. Unconstrained access to complete markets permits flexible exploitation of market power and induces inefficient risk sharing. Appropriate portfolio restrictions counteract this, improving liquidity and risk sharing by bundling securities with offsetting strategic incentives. However, excessive regulation can be counterproductive, destroying gains from trade. An application of our theory shows that cross-asset spillovers are critical for policy evaluation: in general equilibrium, risk sharing can improve even if certain asset-specific liquidity measures deteriorate. We also discuss the effects of asymmetric regulation for different institutions.

Review of Financial StudiesVol. 39(4)
Baylor University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Portfolio Regulation of Financial Institutions with Market Power — Michael Sockin, Daniel Neuhann, et al. · Review of Financial Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS