Limits to the participation paradigm? Unpacking the rhetoric of participation in Flemish cultural policy (1990–2024)

In recent decades, the relation between arts and their social impacts has gained prominence in cultural policy and research. In social cultural work, this debate intensified with the rise of participatory arts practices in the mid-1990s, particularly in multicultural, underprivileged urban neighbourhoods. These practices are often framed as tools to combat social and cultural exclusion. However, critical literature increasingly questions this participation paradigm, arguing that behind its rhetoric, some practices foster merely instrumental forms of involvement. This article examines how the rhetoric of participation operates with in Flemish cultural policy. Through a critical discourse analysis of 140 cultural policy documents (1990-2024), we identify embedded paradigms and trace patterns, shifts, tensions and noteworthy omissions over time. In doing so, we shift focus towards questions of power and authority, revealing how participatory discourses both shape and are shaped by broader political and cultural power relations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cultural Policy
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2025.2583906
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limits to the participation paradigm? Unpacking the rhetoric of participation in Flemish cultural policy (1990–2024)

Geert Vandermeersche, Lieve Bradt, Hanne Dewinter, Kris Rutten
International Journal of Cultural Policy
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Limits to the participation paradigm? Unpacking the rhetoric of participation in Flemish cultural policy (1990–2024)

Geert Vandermeersche, Lieve Bradt, Hanne Dewinter, Kris Rutten
article en

Abstract

In recent decades, the relation between arts and their social impacts has gained prominence in cultural policy and research. In social cultural work, this debate intensified with the rise of participatory arts practices in the mid-1990s, particularly in multicultural, underprivileged urban neighbourhoods. These practices are often framed as tools to combat social and cultural exclusion. However, critical literature increasingly questions this participation paradigm, arguing that behind its rhetoric, some practices foster merely instrumental forms of involvement. This article examines how the rhetoric of participation operates with in Flemish cultural policy. Through a critical discourse analysis of 140 cultural policy documents (1990-2024), we identify embedded paradigms and trace patterns, shifts, tensions and noteworthy omissions over time. In doing so, we shift focus towards questions of power and authority, revealing how participatory discourses both shape and are shaped by broader political and cultural power relations.

International Journal of Cultural Policy
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Research Foundation - Flanders (BE), Ghent University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.