Sensitivity of simulated ammonia fluxes in Rocky Mountain National Park to measurement time resolution and meteorological inputs
Gaseous ammonia ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) is an important precursor for secondary aerosol formation and contributes to reactive nitrogen deposition. <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dry deposition is poorly quantified due to the complex bidirectional nature of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> atmosphere-surface exchange and lack of high time-resolution in situ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> concentration and meteorological measurements. To better quantify <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dry deposition, measurements of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> were made above a subalpine forest canopy in Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) and used with in situ micrometeorology to simulate bidirectional fluxes. <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dry deposition was largest during the summer, with 47 % of annual net <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dry deposition occurring in June, July, and August. Because in situ, high time-resolution concentration and meteorological data are often unavailable, the impacts on estimated deposition from utilizing more commonly available biweekly <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> measurements and ERA5 meteorology were evaluated. Fluxes simulated with biweekly <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> concentrations, commonly available from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> monitoring networks, underestimated <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dry deposition by 45 %. These fluxes were strongly correlated with 30 min fluxes integrated to a biweekly basis ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), indicating that a correction factor could be applied to mitigate the observed bias. Application of an average <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> diel concentration pattern to the biweekly <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> concentration data removed the observed low bias. Annual <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dry deposition from fluxes simulated with reanalysis meteorological inputs exceeded simulations using in situ meteorology measurements by a factor of 2.
Authors
- Aleksandra Djurkovic
- Da Pan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1618-7389)
- Amy P. Sullivan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0143-8197)
- John Thomas Walker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-7514)
- Bret A. Schichtel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5512-8082)
- Jeffrey L. Collett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9180-508X)
- Lillian E. Naimie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0451-0895)
Institutions
- Environmental Protection Agency (US)
- National Park Service (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Atmospheric chemistry and physics
- Published
- 2025-11-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15245-2025
- Primary Topic
- Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Battelle
- Colorado State University
- National Park Service