Computer vision-guided automatic cutting system for chicken parts

To reduce labor costs and enhance the efficiency and accuracy of poultry slaughtering andprocessing, a comprehensive solution was proposed. This system leveragesYOLOV4-CSPDarknet53 and U-Net models to recognize and localize chicken parts, respectively.The chicken parts dataset used in this study achieved mAP (mean Average Precision) of 98.86%with the YOLOv4-CSPDarknet-53 model, and the inference speed for a single image was 22.2ms. Additionally, the performance of the chicken parts image segmentation model based on U-Net yielded an MIOU (Mean Intersection over Union) of 81.03% and a pixel accuracy of 97%.Toaid in planning, a Gaussian process regression model was employed to predict the cuttingdistance of the robotic arm for chicken parts. The coefficient of determination (R) and MAE (Mean Absolute Error) for thepredicted cutting distances Y1 (for the chicken middle wing) and Y2 (for the chicken wings)based on the Gaussian process regression model were 0.69,0.35 and 0.75,0.28,respectively.The “Huichuan” robotic arm and milling cutter worked together to complete the trajectoryplanning and cutting operations of the chicken parts. The final average residual rate of themilling cutter cutting chicken legs was 11.83%, and the average residual rate of cutting chickenwings was 11.68%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CyTA - Journal of Food
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2025.2583765
Primary Topic
Food Supply Chain Traceability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computer vision-guided automatic cutting system for chicken parts

Zhimin Mei, Shucai Wang, Yan Chen, Meiqi Cheng et al.
CyTA - Journal of Food
Food Supply Chain Traceability
article

Computer vision-guided automatic cutting system for chicken parts

Zhimin Mei, Shucai Wang, Yan Chen, Meiqi Cheng, Xianhui Peng
article en

Abstract

To reduce labor costs and enhance the efficiency and accuracy of poultry slaughtering andprocessing, a comprehensive solution was proposed. This system leveragesYOLOV4-CSPDarknet53 and U-Net models to recognize and localize chicken parts, respectively.The chicken parts dataset used in this study achieved mAP (mean Average Precision) of 98.86%with the YOLOv4-CSPDarknet-53 model, and the inference speed for a single image was 22.2ms. Additionally, the performance of the chicken parts image segmentation model based on U-Net yielded an MIOU (Mean Intersection over Union) of 81.03% and a pixel accuracy of 97%.Toaid in planning, a Gaussian process regression model was employed to predict the cuttingdistance of the robotic arm for chicken parts. The coefficient of determination (R) and MAE (Mean Absolute Error) for thepredicted cutting distances Y1 (for the chicken middle wing) and Y2 (for the chicken wings)based on the Gaussian process regression model were 0.69,0.35 and 0.75,0.28,respectively.The “Huichuan” robotic arm and milling cutter worked together to complete the trajectoryplanning and cutting operations of the chicken parts. The final average residual rate of themilling cutter cutting chicken legs was 11.83%, and the average residual rate of cutting chickenwings was 11.68%.

CyTA - Journal of FoodVol. 23(1)
Wuhan Polytechnic University (CN), Huazhong Agricultural University (CN), Wuchang University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Food Supply Chain Traceability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.