Estimating the smallest worthwhile difference of recommended psychotherapies for depression: observational study

Current empirically supported psychotherapy response rates of 15% were sufficient for one in three people to initiate psychotherapy given the burdens, but two in three expected greater treatment benefits or fewer burdens. The SWD for psychotherapy was not materially different from the estimated SWD for antidepressants. Individual patient value judgements and preferences merit greater attention. These findings should be replicated with diverse samples from different geographical locations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10453
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the smallest worthwhile difference of recommended psychotherapies for depression: observational study

Stefan Leucht, Roger Ede, Yan Luo, Andrea Cipriani et al.
3 citations
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Treatment of Major Depression
4.18
article

Estimating the smallest worthwhile difference of recommended psychotherapies for depression: observational study

Stefan Leucht, Roger Ede, Yan Luo, Andrea Cipriani, Aran Tajika, Astrid Chevance, Sarah Markham, Ethan Sahker, Toshi A. Furukawa, Kenji Omae, Manuela L. Ferreira, Georgia Salanti
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Current empirically supported psychotherapy response rates of 15% were sufficient for one in three people to initiate psychotherapy given the burdens, but two in three expected greater treatment benefits or fewer burdens. The SWD for psychotherapy was not materially different from the estimated SWD for antidepressants. Individual patient value judgements and preferences merit greater attention. These findings should be replicated with diverse samples from different geographical locations.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
University of Bern (CH), Inserm (FR), King's College London (GB), Université Paris Cité (FR), Kyoto University (JP), Hotel Dieu Hospital (CA), Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Warneford Hospital (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Oxford (GB), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Health Biomed (China) (CN), Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (FR), Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH), Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) (GB), Fukushima Medical University Hospital (JP), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Treatment of Major Depression
4.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.