Policy and practice: exploring the potentials of social practice theory for policy studies

Social sciences have seen a so-called practice turn, moving beyond a preoccupation with individual attitudes and behaviour towards the more contextually-embedded concept of social practices to understand drivers and change levers of social action. However, in the policy sciences engagement with Social Practice Theories (SPT) is relatively scarce. Approaches and studies endorsing behaviourist approaches continue to outnumber more sociological, relational perspectives, including SPT. Behaviourist and SPT approaches rest on divergent understandings of social action and change, with contrasting implications for understanding the impact of policy alternatives and the policy processes. In this article, we stimulate discussion on how wider use of SPT–as developed in the field of sociology–in public policy can advance understanding of the dynamics of policy impact and policymaking. Based on a systematic review of current applications of SPT in public administration journals we identify the motivations for and scope of SPT in policy research, after which we propose a research agenda along two streams of theorization which may benefit from engaging more thoroughly with SPT: (i) the practices of target groups, and (ii) the practices of policy work and public administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2025.2584195
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy and practice: exploring the potentials of social practice theory for policy studies

Mary Greene, Jeroen Candel, Daniel Polman
Policy Studies
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Policy and practice: exploring the potentials of social practice theory for policy studies

Mary Greene, Jeroen Candel, Daniel Polman
article en

Abstract

Social sciences have seen a so-called practice turn, moving beyond a preoccupation with individual attitudes and behaviour towards the more contextually-embedded concept of social practices to understand drivers and change levers of social action. However, in the policy sciences engagement with Social Practice Theories (SPT) is relatively scarce. Approaches and studies endorsing behaviourist approaches continue to outnumber more sociological, relational perspectives, including SPT. Behaviourist and SPT approaches rest on divergent understandings of social action and change, with contrasting implications for understanding the impact of policy alternatives and the policy processes. In this article, we stimulate discussion on how wider use of SPT–as developed in the field of sociology–in public policy can advance understanding of the dynamics of policy impact and policymaking. Based on a systematic review of current applications of SPT in public administration journals we identify the motivations for and scope of SPT in policy research, after which we propose a research agenda along two streams of theorization which may benefit from engaging more thoroughly with SPT: (i) the practices of target groups, and (ii) the practices of policy work and public administration.

Policy Studies
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Policy and practice: exploring the potentials of social practice theory for policy studies — Mary Greene, Jeroen Candel, et al. · Policy Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS