Differences of sound insulation as tested in laboratory and in-situ conditions for corporate office construction system

Acoustic insulation, acoustic conditioning, and noise control, when combined, are fundamental to perceived sound quality and to the suitability of environments for their designated functions. These concepts also apply to acoustic projects for offices, where occupants expect acoustical comfort and speech privacy. This study compares the results of field measurements in a built office with laboratory tests for the systems adopted in the project. It also evaluates compliance with design criteria and project expectations. The field tests followed ASTM and ISO standards, depending on the case. Evaluating the occupants' perception of privacy and comfort was an important aspect of this research. This allowed for a broad view from the design methods to the post-construction results. The differences evaluated between the laboratory and the field are significant, particularly for glass partitions and doors. This difference can be greater than 9 dB in some situations. We could not relate the differences found exclusively to installation failures, and we recommend reviewing the laboratory test procedures. The present research might help in making decisions at the design and construction stage, and in the testing and manufacturing process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NOISE-CON proceedings
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3397/in_2025_1076225
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences of sound insulation as tested in laboratory and in-situ conditions for corporate office construction system

Julio Gaspar, Gunther Hoffmann, Renato Costa de Sá
NOISE-CON proceedings
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Differences of sound insulation as tested in laboratory and in-situ conditions for corporate office construction system

Julio Gaspar, Gunther Hoffmann, Renato Costa de Sá
article en

Abstract

Acoustic insulation, acoustic conditioning, and noise control, when combined, are fundamental to perceived sound quality and to the suitability of environments for their designated functions. These concepts also apply to acoustic projects for offices, where occupants expect acoustical comfort and speech privacy. This study compares the results of field measurements in a built office with laboratory tests for the systems adopted in the project. It also evaluates compliance with design criteria and project expectations. The field tests followed ASTM and ISO standards, depending on the case. Evaluating the occupants' perception of privacy and comfort was an important aspect of this research. This allowed for a broad view from the design methods to the post-construction results. The differences evaluated between the laboratory and the field are significant, particularly for glass partitions and doors. This difference can be greater than 9 dB in some situations. We could not relate the differences found exclusively to installation failures, and we recommend reviewing the laboratory test procedures. The present research might help in making decisions at the design and construction stage, and in the testing and manufacturing process.

NOISE-CON proceedingsVol. 272(2)
National Society of Professional Engineers (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.