Lazy Trust in the Digital World: Zuboff, Kant, and the Extraction of Surplus Data

Abstract The commodification of data traces of online activities is central to the digital economy. The result is a ‘surveillance capitalism’ based on collaborations between states and private technology companies: states recommend private companies as stewards of citizens’ data, thus appealing to citizens to trust tech companies to manage their data in a just and trustworthy manner. We adopt a Kantian view to analyze this recommendation, which is founded on a pragmatic relation of trust between states and tech companies. Our analysis shows how the EU regulatory framework is based on self-management of data and guided by principles of transparency, accountability, and protection of privacy, on one hand, and of the free flow of data in the single market on the other. This leads most citizens into a malevolent passive attitude of trust, what Kant would call ‘lazy trust.’ The paper calls for principled regulations more conducive to moral trust in the digital world, particularly regarding data extraction practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Danish Yearbook of Philosophy
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/24689300-bja10084
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lazy Trust in the Digital World: Zuboff, Kant, and the Extraction of Surplus Data

Micol Mieli, Esther Oluffa Pedersen
Danish Yearbook of Philosophy
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Lazy Trust in the Digital World: Zuboff, Kant, and the Extraction of Surplus Data

Micol Mieli, Esther Oluffa Pedersen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The commodification of data traces of online activities is central to the digital economy. The result is a ‘surveillance capitalism’ based on collaborations between states and private technology companies: states recommend private companies as stewards of citizens’ data, thus appealing to citizens to trust tech companies to manage their data in a just and trustworthy manner. We adopt a Kantian view to analyze this recommendation, which is founded on a pragmatic relation of trust between states and tech companies. Our analysis shows how the EU regulatory framework is based on self-management of data and guided by principles of transparency, accountability, and protection of privacy, on one hand, and of the free flow of data in the single market on the other. This leads most citizens into a malevolent passive attitude of trust, what Kant would call ‘lazy trust.’ The paper calls for principled regulations more conducive to moral trust in the digital world, particularly regarding data extraction practices.

Danish Yearbook of Philosophy
Roskilde University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.