Exploring the affordances of generative AI in academic writing for students with disabilities: A bottom-up approach to inform GenAI policies

This study explores the use and attitudes towards generative AI (GenAI) tools among students with disabilities in higher education (HE), addressing a gap in existing research on accessibility and inclusivity challenges for marginalised groups. Informed by a prior study and affordance theory, we surveyed 124 students with various disabilities, mainly with neurodiversity, dyslexia and social/communication impairment, about their use of and attitudes toward GenAI tools during academic writing. We identified three key affordances provided by GenAI tools, including explainability, expressibility, and plannability, that positively affect students with disabilities’ learning, especially writing processes. However, our study also highlights significant areas where GenAI tools remains insufficient in addressing barriers faced by students with disabilities, such as low learning motivation and time management issues. Our findings offer practical implications for both educational practitioners, GenAI developers and policy makers. These include the need to design more inclusive GenAI tools and to promote AI literacy, along with providing policy guidance and training for both students and staff in HE institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Futures in Education
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103251395436
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the affordances of generative AI in academic writing for students with disabilities: A bottom-up approach to inform GenAI policies

Xuanning Chen, Xin Zhao, Andrew Cox
2 citations
Policy Futures in Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Exploring the affordances of generative AI in academic writing for students with disabilities: A bottom-up approach to inform GenAI policies

Xuanning Chen, Xin Zhao, Andrew Cox
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study explores the use and attitudes towards generative AI (GenAI) tools among students with disabilities in higher education (HE), addressing a gap in existing research on accessibility and inclusivity challenges for marginalised groups. Informed by a prior study and affordance theory, we surveyed 124 students with various disabilities, mainly with neurodiversity, dyslexia and social/communication impairment, about their use of and attitudes toward GenAI tools during academic writing. We identified three key affordances provided by GenAI tools, including explainability, expressibility, and plannability, that positively affect students with disabilities’ learning, especially writing processes. However, our study also highlights significant areas where GenAI tools remains insufficient in addressing barriers faced by students with disabilities, such as low learning motivation and time management issues. Our findings offer practical implications for both educational practitioners, GenAI developers and policy makers. These include the need to design more inclusive GenAI tools and to promote AI literacy, along with providing policy guidance and training for both students and staff in HE institutions.

Policy Futures in EducationVol. 24(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.