Understanding empathy in medical education: A cross-sectional study of cognitive and affective dimensions among undergraduate students

ABSTRACT Background: Clinical empathy is putting oneself in the patient’s position and experiencing the patient’s emotions. However, during medical school, there might be a decline in empathy levels. Aim: The aims of this study were to assess the level of cognitive and affective empathy across various MBBS batch students and to determine the factors that influence empathy. Methodology: This cross-sectional study involved 106 medical students, with empathy assessed using the affective and cognitive empathy subscales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Results: Among the 106 respondents, most (36.34%) were in their 2 nd year, with 51.9% aged 21–23, 68.9% female, and 51.9% residing in urban areas. Overall empathy scores were highest in the 1 st year, declining in the 2 nd and 3 rd years, then increasing in the final year and during the compulsory rotating medical internship period. The Personal Distress domain of affective empathy was significantly notable. Chi-square analysis indicated that age (P = 0.008), year of study ( P = 0.025), gender ( P = 0.005), and stressful situations ( P = 0.046) significantly influenced empathy scores. Conclusions: This study found that empathy is positively associated with female gender and older age, but negatively correlated with stress levels. Enhancing medical students’ empathy may require effective stress management and improved social support. These findings underscore the need for curriculum reforms in medical education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Telangana Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/tjp.tjp_15_24
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding empathy in medical education: A cross-sectional study of cognitive and affective dimensions among undergraduate students

K. Ravisankar, Subramanian Shankar
Telangana Journal of Psychiatry
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Understanding empathy in medical education: A cross-sectional study of cognitive and affective dimensions among undergraduate students

K. Ravisankar, Subramanian Shankar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Clinical empathy is putting oneself in the patient’s position and experiencing the patient’s emotions. However, during medical school, there might be a decline in empathy levels. Aim: The aims of this study were to assess the level of cognitive and affective empathy across various MBBS batch students and to determine the factors that influence empathy. Methodology: This cross-sectional study involved 106 medical students, with empathy assessed using the affective and cognitive empathy subscales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Results: Among the 106 respondents, most (36.34%) were in their 2 nd year, with 51.9% aged 21–23, 68.9% female, and 51.9% residing in urban areas. Overall empathy scores were highest in the 1 st year, declining in the 2 nd and 3 rd years, then increasing in the final year and during the compulsory rotating medical internship period. The Personal Distress domain of affective empathy was significantly notable. Chi-square analysis indicated that age (P = 0.008), year of study ( P = 0.025), gender ( P = 0.005), and stressful situations ( P = 0.046) significantly influenced empathy scores. Conclusions: This study found that empathy is positively associated with female gender and older age, but negatively correlated with stress levels. Enhancing medical students’ empathy may require effective stress management and improved social support. These findings underscore the need for curriculum reforms in medical education.

Telangana Journal of Psychiatry
Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.